User talk:Bigemail90

Speedy deletion nomination of Free Money (concept)


A tag has been placed on Free Money (concept), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Free Money (concept) and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste: talk 22:43, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Free Money (concept)
A tag has been placed on Free Money (concept) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. DJ Bullfish  22:48, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Right to life, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Teapot  george Talk  22:48, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Spatial arts
A tag has been placed on Spatial arts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Teapot  george Talk  22:49, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Teapotgeorge. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Teapot  george Talk  22:52, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at I Gotta Get Mine Yo, you will be blocked from editing.  Teapot  george Talk  22:54, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Hardcore hip hop. StaticGull Talk  22:56, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Blocked
Hello, I've blocked this account as you appear to be indiscriminately adding deletion tags to multiple articles. I've got to ask, is this something you intend continuing after the block expires? Do you need anything explaining? -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:07, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Please Explain
I need you to explain why your mom isn't good at giving head. --Bigemail90 (talk) 23:11, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, so now the block is of an indefinite duration, pending a more promising response, and it will be no big deal to have your talk page access removed. See the details for more info. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:18, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Why do you care about Wikipedia anyway? It had ridiculous and terrible articles that would be embarrassing to have in a real encyclopedia. Pages like 'I Gotta Get Mine Yo' and 'Imma Fool Wit It'. What a joke. --Bigemail90 (talk) 23:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * In that case you won't mind that I've made it impossible for you to edit this or any other Wikipedia page any further; enjoy your joke elsewhere. Accounting4Taste: talk 23:39, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pictorial arts
A tag has been placed on Pictorial arts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 23:50, 12 November 2009 (UTC)