User talk:Bigenano

Speedy deletion of Lula's Chocolates
A tag has been placed on Lula's Chocolates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dougie WII (talk) 21:12, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

I nominated this article for speedy deletion for copyvio, but the administrator who actually deleted it did so for the reason it was blatent advertising. In any case, the notability of the company needs to be shown and if material from the website is used, there has to be a notice on the website that it is released under the GFDL license. If the company has not been the subject of multiple, independent news articles etc., then it probably doesn't meet requirements for inclusion in Wikipedia. See WP:CORP -- Dougie WII (talk) 23:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC)