User talk:Bigglesbi1

Welcome!
Hello Bigglesbi1, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place   on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:14, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

An editor, or editors, have expressed concerns that  the article may  need adjusting  to  comply  with  Wikipedia policies. Please review the messages that have been placed on  the page, following  any blue links to  policies, and address the issues if you  can. Thank you again for your contribution  to  the encyclopedia. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:18, 12 July 2011 (UTC).

Help
This is my first wikipedia entry and the feedback is that there may be original research in my entry (there is not). Is it possible to know exactly which parts of the entry are deemed original research (as I have put in quite a few references, but possibly missed a couple?). Thank you
 * All references were (except the first) published by the same organization. So maybe try to find other newscoverage. And don't forget to sign! mabdul 18:45, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

PUBMED
Thank you for the help on my previous question. The references are by different people and published by different publishers. The reference URLs in my article are links to PubMed, which is the standard library used by medical researchers to access articles. The PMID is a standard identifier that uniquely identifies journal articles, and used by researchers as an easy way to refer to articles. I guess there is some script that checks URLs and found that nearly all point to PubMed. While I can change the URLs now to point to the individual journal pages, may I suggest that Wikipedia accepts the PubMed links as they provide a more useful context for the researcher? - thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigglesbi1 (talk • contribs)
 * Yes you can! :) Within the templates that you are using in the article, you can add the parameter , and it will then link directly to the PubMed database. Good luck, and feel free to use  again or ask on my talkpage if you need anything else! Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:30, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Prof Paul Workman FRS 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Prof Paul Workman FRS 2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 21:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)