User talk:Bigmaz

1

Nonsense of Gwobby
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Gwobby, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Gwobby provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Gwobby, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:10, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: Gwobby
It was complete nonsense. If you can provide sources to prove otherwise, I'll consider restoring it, but please note that the article will need to meet several criteria of notability and all your sources will have to be reliable. For a list of the reasons pages can be deleted without discussion, see WP:CSD.

And you do have a talk page, it's at User talk:Bigmaz. Please sign your posts on talk pages with ~. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 16:57, 3 August 2008 (UTC)


 * That's not a reliable source. Please see WP:RS for details. You need multiple third-party, unsolicited, sources to confirm its notability. Hers fold  non-admin (t/a/c) 22:42, 3 August 2008 (UTC)