User talk:Bignole/Archive/2011/December

Kara Chronicles, Visions, and Wayback
I grant you the two things you are saying: - yes, the visions link just display the cover; - yes, the kara does not load... but... in my firefox 8.0 with adobe flash player (plug-in ?) 11.1.102.55 (all of these are free), yes, kara does not load... but i tried the left blue arrow (the previous date) on the top of the wayback display page, and it did load... and then, i went for the right blue arrow (the next date, ie, the date i was linking), and it did load... so, there's a problem with the load (cache of somekind?), but, in my first edit (day: 1st of december, or 30th of november), it did load the first time, without any problems. Bottom line: - the visions link is just to provide an accurate source for the title of the comic; - the kara link, without any load/cache problems, provides an accurate source for viewing the series (yes, i click ep 1, and saw it, and then click ep 2, and saw it, etc.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.132.71.158 (talk) 03:41, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Paradise Lost (2013 film)
You recently took part in a deletion discussion for this film, but given new information that the film is now on hold, would suggest a redirect to Paradise Lost is more appropriate as per WP:NFF, and as per suggested by multiple editors at the deletion discussion. Would appreciate input at Talk:Paradise Lost (2013 film). --Rob Sinden (talk) 09:13, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

TAS
I felt that way too but I noticed The Avengers (2012 film) paraphrasing sources without quotations and I trusted good judgement so I thought nothing of it. Should that be changed too? Granted I know it's not paraphrased all the way now it also included "of superheroes" on it but it's still a little similiar. Jhenderson 7 7 7  15:53, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Excuse me but I didn't mean the definition of paraphrase but I meant almost identical. Thank you for noticing my mistake. Only "of superheroes" seemed to be added with the statement other than that it's seems to be the same as the source. But thank you for the concern of the article. I appreciate your help and I hope we can get along. With all my contributions I was bound to do something wrong so thank goodness we got you. :) Jhenderson  7 7 7  16:06, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Tis the season


MarnetteD | Talk is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to your friends' talk pages.

I also hope that you have a great 2012. Many thanks for all the care you take with so many articles (especially film ones) here at WikiP. MarnetteD | Talk 21:53, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Amazon.com for home release information in television articles
Hey, Bignole. Is it true that Amazon.com should not be used for home release information? The GA reviewer of the One Tree Hill (TV series) article has stated that it should not be, but I see that the Smallville article you got to GA status uses Amazon.com for its home release information as well. I don't know where to look for this type of information, seeing as I don't usually go around sourcing release dates, ratings and stuff like that. I know that I could find reliable sites for this information, but I just generally want to stick to one site for this info. And since the GA process will be over tomorrow, it may take significantly longer than I can afford in order to locate this stuff (the release info). Flyer22 (talk) 20:28, 24 December 2011 (UTC)