User talk:Bignole/Archive/2013/April

Clark, Lois, Lex, and Chloe.
I've made some additions on these pages. Can you check them out?--NeoBatfreak (talk) 00:29, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I've added more details on Clark, Chloe and Lex, including Clark's new developments of his powers, and more mysteries of Chloe's double are revealed.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 18:28, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Further details of the character pages are added, including Tess's techno-resurrection and Oliver and Chloe's leave for their unborn baby. You probably want to find out what Lana's superhero handle is in Africa.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 21:43, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Arrow RfC
Was there a reason you classified the RfC as 'unsorted' as opposed to that of 'Media?' It would seem smarter to put the RfC where editors more interested in the subject matter could be notified. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 15:25, 3 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I put in "arts" instead of "media" by accident. It has been corrected.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  16:25, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I presumed it was an oversight. Thanks for resolving it. I really don't like to mess with the internal structures of processes here in Wikipedia. I did that once, and nearly broke the internet. ;) - Jack Sebastian (talk) 19:22, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Btw, nice work on the episode summaries. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 16:06, 4 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks. They can always use tweaking. It's such a battle to try and figure out what is truly important enough to make note of, and what can ultimately be ignored (at least in the moment).   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  16:24, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * When I've done those things (most recently at Tron:Uprising), I've always opted for the Less is Better approach. If subsequent events make one of the earlier plot points important, it can be revisited. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 16:42, 4 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I feel the same way. Sometimes it's easier to just clarify in the later plot, where the event now makes more sense than leaving these generally minor points that only make sense to fans of the comics (e.g., people wanting to include Deathstroke's mask from the pilot, yet you don't even know anything about him for half the season).   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  16:46, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Precisely. I used to hate Smallville for blurring the distinction between the comic book characters they appropriated for the series and the douche-canoe way they used to royally mess them up into little more than 2D cutouts used to chew scenery. Someone deserves a kick in the teeth for the tv Hawkman, period. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 17:09, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I liked the Smallville version of Hawkman. The latter seasons, I think, did a better job with the characters than the earlier seasons where they were more "influenced" on the comics, than actual representation because of all the legal issues surrounding their use.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  18:35, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * To each their own. :) - Jack Sebastian (talk) 18:38, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Why did you undo my revision ?
I'm just adding WP links on Arrow (TV series), did I make something wrong ? VigileLentille (talk) 12:33, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello!
Hello, Bignole! Hope you are doing well. I thought you'd like to know that the soap opera article you helped me review, Victoria Newman, was finally copyedited by the Guild. I know you told me that soap articles aren't really your specialty, but I've been working on another article for over two months, during which it was nominated for GA. I've had it copyedited and other users have helped me on it too, but I just can't find a reviewer. Virtually everyone is occupied elsewhere. You too are probably busy with other tasks, but I just figured I'd ask you if you'd have any interest in helping me out. No worries if you can't though. Cheers! Regards,  Creativity  97  04:38, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

"Making it up on the spot"
You understand that I was not suggesting tht you were, but that it seemed as if Caringtype was perhaps of that opinion, right? - Jack Sebastian (talk) 13:56, 23 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I was not aware of that. I apologize, because that was how I read it.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  14:13, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, back before I started editing, my Dad was a regular contributor here, and thought you are one of the 'good' editors here. You can imagine how surprised I was when we ended up on opposite sides of an edit. I should have written more clearly.
 * On a side note, I think you might be confusing me and my Dad; he edited with you on the Smallville article, not me. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 18:07, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Was it the same name? Maybe your dad and I were just on the same side in how we think, and you're the outlier. ;) j/k.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  18:21, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * No, my Dad had another account, which has been inactive for some time, since he went into treatment at Mayo. I took over a lot of his unfinished articles, but stayed away from those in his watchlist. Even though he doesn't edit anymore, I wanted to avoid accusations of meatpuppetry, canvassing or cabaling by participating in discussions he was invested in. If there's been some crossover, its pretty much coincidental. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 03:59, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry to hear that. I hope that he's doing better. I can understand not wanting that drama, but it appears that you have differing opinions and styles, so I would like to believe that people would have enough common sense not to just jump to the idea of you being a sock. Then again, that's typically the easiest argument against someone else...to just call them a sock.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  04:14, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Shortly after I started editing, I ran into one of my pop's Unfriendlies while editing. They were absolutely sure I was my Dad, and came close to out me as him. I would have won that particular argument, but it would have been ugly. It made me a LOT more careful and transparent in my editing. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 14:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Really? That's interesting. What was your dad's editing name? Just to clarify, although we disagree on (what I would consider) stupid things in the grand scheme of the article, I do think you're an excellent editor.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  18:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * i became too busy to respond, but I wanted to thank you for the wonderful compliment. I don't get to edit as much as I'd like, but I do try to do the best I can when I can. :)