User talk:Bignole/Archive/2013/January

Hello
Do you remember Boggydark? 72.49.140.169 (talk) 05:44, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Superman: Earth One Volume Two
Hi, even though it is not Smallville related article, but I wonder if you can take a shot at graphic novel Superman: Earth One Volume Two? Thanks.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 03:59, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Victoria Newman
Hi there! Flyer22 directed me to you on helping me prepare the article Victoria Newman for a GA review. They said you are very good at writing fiction articles and this is why I ask you. If you haven't the time to help at the moment, that's okay. I just thought I'd ask! Let me know. Regards,  Creativity  97  15:12, 6 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Overall, the structure looks good for the article. I would make sure it has a good copy edit (which you can request at the League of Copy Editors WikiProject). I would make sure that in-universe information stays within the plot section, and that characterization and relationships are written from an out-of-universe approach. Meaning, that we are not the ones interpreting their characteristics or their relationships.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  16:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your help! Do you review articles for WP:GA?  Creativity  97  19:36, 6 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Anyone can review an article for GA, you just need to post it to the nominations page and wait for someone to review it. I don't have a lot of time, which is why I did not provide an in-depth critique of the page.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  21:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm aware of that, thanks! I was wondering if, when you had the time, maybe you'd be interested in reviewing it? There's no real rush, but I've put so much work into it the past while it's tedious to sit back and wait for someone to come along and volunteer to review it, you know?  Creativity  97  23:50, 8 January 2013 (UTC)


 * If you haven't already, post it on the nominations review page. I'll put the article on my watchlist and if I find some time to review then I'll do it and take care of the official piece of it (filling out the appropriate template and such) at that time. Sometimes there is a long wait at the GAN, and sometimes it's not. It just depends. If I can get to it before someone else, then I will. If not, then at least you already have it listed.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  23:57, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi
I don't mean to be difficult, I just think it could be clearer. That's all. I hope you don't get mad, but I altered it a little, I think it fit both our version.

Please tell me what do you think, do you think it can stay?TheManOfSteele (talk) 03:24, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

I change it because Lana changing because of Clark and Lex's decision is not what made her a tragic figurebecoming the receptacle of they bad decisions did. (She will always love Clark, and Clark will always love her, but it was Clark’s bad decisions, and Lex’s "basest instincts" that make Lana the "receptacle of all of these bad decisions", marking her as a tragic figure on the show)TheManOfSteele (talk) 03:36, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

I apologize, I'm still learning the ropes around here, I mostly edit on wikis, so I have a bad habit of deleting stuff because to "me" it seem a little unnecessary. Where on here, it facts and source. Still learning, but I'll catch on.TheManOfSteele (talk) 03:46, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

No you misunderstood me--What I meant was Lana didn't become a tragic figure (I get that now) because she changed (changing is not really tragic), she became a tragic figure because she became the receptacle of their bad decisions. (Basically, she suffered the consequence of their bad decisions; that's what makes her tragic). That's what the producers were trying to say---(make Lana the "receptacle of all of these bad decisions", marking her as a tragic figure on the show)TheManOfSteele (talk) 03:56, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Ok. PS, I will put back bad, I had no problem with it.TheManOfSteele (talk) 04:02, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

I looked up tragic figure, don't laugh. Atleast now I have a better understanding of what it means.:)TheManOfSteele (talk) 04:05, 8 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi, can I add the sentence "implying that she would eventually again appears into Clark's life?" Though Lana appears in a non-speaking cameo in the ninth issue, it usually means future appearances in comic books. Especially as shown in the series finale, that it took Clark and Lois 7 years to finally getting married; aside Lex marked Clark with his tracking radiation, another reason had to be because of Lana.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 06:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Justice League (Smallville)
Hi, its me again. I've added more information regarding John Jones and Batman's team up on the page. However, I feel it need copy edit, and I am not sure on my grammar. Thanks,--NeoBatfreak (talk) 03:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arrow (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Firefly (comics) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

M-net
M-net is a network in South Africa, not a channel. Many pages list the networks of international distribution (Sex and the City, for instance.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.160.64.109 (talk) 00:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Review
Hello, Bignole. I was wondering if, anytime soon, you'd have any time to review this article for GA. I hate to sound like a broken record here but it's been about a month and no one else had volunteered. Please let me know at your earliest convenience. Thanks! Regards,  Creativity  97  03:36, 28 January 2013 (UTC)