User talk:Bignole/Archive/2013/March

Featured article review/Jurassic Park (film)/archive1
You were one of major editors of Jurassic Park (film), weren't you? Right now, it is under FA review, so help this article retain its FA status by improving it. Otherwise, it may be likely delisted. Also, you may join in discussion by clicking section heading. --George Ho (talk) 05:24, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Friday the 13th Part 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amy Steel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Texas Chainsaw 3d - Read this message carefully
Listen bignole I'm really sick of people like you reverting others edits which are reliably sourced just because they think that source is not reliable because they've never heard of it. This is getting really frustrating. How many times again and again I've told you BOM is not always reluable. You say that using boxoffice.com as a reliable source is just a personal interpetation of mine. Well I instead ask you what proof do you have that it's not reliable? Don't use the same "you've never heard of it" excuse. That's not a proof. If you dont think it is reliable then take this matter to the reliable sources noticeboard. Also I'll tell you beforehand that many users are now using boxoffice.com as a source instead of Box office mojo. I dont think BOM is even reliable anymore. Please stop reverting my edits without a proper proof and take this matter to reliable sources noticeboard to prevent this escalating into an edit war. If you revert my edits again without proving that boxoffice.com is not reliable then I'll have to report about you for edit warring. KahnJohn27 (talk) 19:16, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Really sorry
I'm really sorry. I've run on bad luck in my life lately. Also I don't have any free time these days and with much difficulty I'm able to find time to edit wikipedia. I earlier did a lot of discussion with you about tc3d and it really frustrated me when you told me that you had realised you mistook boxoffice.com for box office mojo. Because I thought I wasted a lot of time for nothing. I really am able to find very little free time and well.it gets mostly used up editing wikpedia. So sometimes it gets really frustrating that a edit on which you have spent so much time gets reverted just because someone thinks that this source is correct and that is not. So from your edit summary I mistook you to be the one who reverted my edits as I did not think about it clearly. I"m sorrry for rudeness. I hope you understand. KahnJohn27 (talk) 23:07, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

A thousand thanks
Thanks for the star friend actualky a thousand thanks ha ha. Although I don't think I deserve it all. I'm not that resilient. But stilk it's my first star.I always wanted one of them. Not because it gave me a special statud because it showed that people recognize my work and aporecciate it. Thanks a lot. This has lightned my mood up a lot. Sorry for the outburst again and happy editing. KahnJohn27 (talk) 23:35, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Buffy the Vampire Slayer (TV series)
I figured that you may want to weigh in on this new move discussion, since you did last time. Flyer22 (talk) 15:55, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Edit revert - List of Arrow episodes
Too early doesn't make sense as an argument, as it's very subjective when "too early" is. I just noticed that the article was starting to get way too long. And I know that it's the wrong name (it isn't supposed to be capitalized), but only an administrator or person with special powers could place that at the right name. That is due to the List of Arrow episodes article being a redirect with history, so I couldn't move the article to that location. Now, seeing as the data is important and valuable, as well as being a better place for it, I am going to not undo your revert, but instead place the information on the article linked above, which has the correct name.-- ɱ   (talk)   21:58, 30 March 2013 (UTC) 01:16, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

-- ɱ   (talk)   21:58, 30 March 2013 (UTC) 01:42, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Arrow revert
Let me be frank: this is stupid. WP:SIZE is an editing guideline. If I choose not to follow a guideline, you can't just auto-revert and cite the guideline as a reason. Sorry. You can do that if it was a policy. But seeing as it's a guideline, I am therefore under no obligation to follow it. Thus you should've wrote something on a talk page just now, instead of reverting my edit.

Also, I posted in response to you and User:‎SchrutedIt08 on his talk page, saying that all of your concerns would be met by the time the final episode aired. I gave you both fair warning well ahead of time that on this day, I would redo those edits. And I did. Don't go claiming you didn't see it, and don't go claiming I shouldn't have done it, 'cause if you just plainly ignore me while I'm clearly stating my intentions, you're at blame too. (Hitler clearly stated his intentions back in '25 with Mein Kampf, and Europe as well as a good deal of the world suffered greatly in good part due to that ignorance. In addition, Chamberlain's infamous appeasement agreement makes no sense when you regard that Hitler plainly stated his desire for world domination well back in 1925.) -- ɱ   (talk)   21:58, 30 March 2013 (UTC) 02:34, 17 May 2013 (UTC)