User talk:Bignole/Archive/2018/November

LoE discussion
Where is the discussion you refer to in this edit in the sentence "We also decided we wouldn't rush across Wikipedia to get them all in line immediately when we talked about getting this issue under control"? Thanks. — Bilorv(c)(talk) 23:31, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Michael Myers (Halloween)
Hi. Regarding your edit comment here:. I have left a message on his talkpage regarding the matter. He hasn't logged in since, but when he does I hope he will read it and take on board what I have said. The best scenario would be that he discusses the matter with you on the article talkpage to resolve the dispute. I would be willing to mediate that discussion if both you and he agree. SilkTork (talk) 17:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with that. It's a stupid thing because it's a citation tag for something easily probably fixed.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  17:31, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I've put a cite in. Does that work for you? SilkTork (talk) 19:22, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * That's fine. Ironically, all that ever needed to be done was a "cite video" template. At the time, I was in a rush and just quickly tagged the page. After that, it became more principle of the point to not let it get removed without being filled in, honestly, because there's nothing that says it doesn't require a source (contrary to what the other editors was stating).   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  20:15, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Jason Vorhees
I noticed you do alot of editing on the various Friday The 13th pages. I also noticed you uploaded a couple of pics. Wouldn't it be cool to upload this photo here from this article here  to illustrate the Men Behind The Masks section on the Jason Vorhees page?Giantdevilfish (talk) 16:25, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * It's a nice photo, but I don't think we can justify the non-free image. If someone had taken it and put it in the public domain, then yes. It's iffy if a rationale can be found to justify another image there, as there needs to be critical commentary on the non-free images in the article. THat's why you see direct commentary on each of the images that are there, as the image is used to illustrate the commentary to enhance readers' understanding. Although it's a nice image, I'm not sure that seeing a photo (non-free) of them all 40 years later in some cases really adds behind what a fan would want.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  16:19, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Discussion at Teahouse
You are invited to join the discussion at Teahouse. — Lbtocthtalk  06:18, 30 November 2018 (UTC)