User talk:Bigpappaking

May 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Medard Boss, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Medard Boss was changed by Bigpappaking (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952952 on 2012-05-27T19:46:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:47, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Saleem Ullah


A tag has been placed on Saleem Ullah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &#124; Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  19:51, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
Good evening,

Yes, everyone can make a contribution but each contribution is reviewed by every people reading the article.

By automated ways like bots too, see what happened to your contribution.

What is nice is you develop your critical thinking skill!

Be careful but even a specialist could make errors. Each assertion should be weighted and compared to external sources if you're in doubt. That's applicable AND for Wikipedia AND for any of your readings.

Dereckson (talk) 21:35, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

&#160;