User talk:Bigstroonz

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Bigstroonz for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ⒺⓋⒾ ⓁⒼⓄ ⒽⒶⓃ ② talk 03:02, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Astrolatry, you may be blocked from editing. ''It is evident that you are the holder of the previous 2 IPs associated with editing this article and are engaging in Edit Warring as well as violation of 3RR. Please cease your actions.'' ⒺⓋⒾ ⓁⒼⓄ ⒽⒶⓃ ②  talk 03:11, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Astrolatry, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Section blanking because you personally don't agree with something, especially when other editors continue to refute your claims, is disruptive. Also, the edits you are removing are constructive and help to introduce a more neutral article that does not go towards one particular point of view. Wikipedia does not censor and allows this material in the sense of it being informative. Because the information presented follows that standard of being informative without being disruptive, it is not vandalism - as you claim - and thus allowed. Your actions, on the other hand, are not. Immediately cease your disruptive actions or I will have to report you to the ARV.'' ⒺⓋⒾ ⓁⒼⓄ ⒽⒶⓃ ②  talk 03:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

 You have been blocked. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see Appealing a block. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Astrolatry, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. In particular, exegesis, taking verses and interpreting them for the reader, is frowned upon. Accepted practice is to report the interpretations of notable individuals or groups. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:17, 6 July 2010 (UTC)