User talk:Bigwyrm

Thanks
Thanks for fixing that error I made in the Internet Archive article. ^_^ Linkskywalker 19:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Reggie Jackson?
I think you are mistaking, the only thing I did was add the Picture to the page, the editor before me wrote the "chicken licken nigger" comment.
 * My apologies. You are correct: I was mistaken. Bigwyrm 01:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Honey
i replied to your comment.i would appreciate if you can take your time and respond to it.thanks againGrandia01 15:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I will pass on that. I already explained and expanded my thoughts on the subject. You were the one who added the material in question, so I can only assume that you believe that your understanding of the material is accurate. I would now like to elicit the opinions of others. -- Bigwyrm 18:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Your recent report to WP:AIV
Thank you for making a report at Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khukri (talk • contribs) 07:15, 15 July 2007


 * Well, I really think that the block criteria were met, but no worries. User(s) at this IP vandalize Wikipedia often enough that I'll have ample opportunity to repost the report. — Bigwyrm watch mewake me 10:32, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

FNORD
Hi! This is Icarus!, being non-Wiki (I'm not logged in...), saying thanx for the work on the Discordianism page! Keep it up!24.176.20.60 17:44, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Religion categories
Hi. I just want to express my appreciation for your detailed and thought-out responses to my comments regarding the deletion of the various religion categories. Even though I don't exactly agree with the assumption on which your argument is grounded, it's the most coherent and well-reasoned argument I've seen for retaining those categories. Since I was on wikibreak, I didn't get an opportunity to respond to your individual posts; I've posted a reply at the JW discussion. Cheers, Black Falcon (Talk) 00:24, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

General Order merge tag
Thanks for removing the merge tags - after doing the merge I was distracted by another page and forgot to clean up after the change. Euryalus (talk) 11:55, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Yeast
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Yeast/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:01, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of PSI Seminars for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PSI Seminars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/PSI Seminars until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.