User talk:Bijoyak

Image copyright problem with Image:NatureSoft_200x40.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:NatureSoft_200x40.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 12:31, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Kureekkal family
I've added the "prod" template to the article Kureekkal family, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Kureekkal family. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Wknight94 (talk) 16:55, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kureekkal


The article Kureekkal has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable local family. Can't find any reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salih ( talk ) 09:23, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

December 2011
Hello and welcome! Although everyone is welcome to contribute, an external link you added seems inappropriate according to our guidelines, and has been removed. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a web directory, so we try to have articles link to only a few key sites. Thank you! Shadowjams (talk) 04:26, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Syriac Catholic Church with this edit. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 04:29, 5 December 2011 (UTC)