User talk:Bikerun

Important Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Coordinated editing attack on University of Management and Technology (United States). &#x2230; Bellezzasolo &#x2721;  Discuss  13:07, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Request to unblock
investigated


 * You both made the same edit to the same article, and are editing from the same IP on the same computer. You both registered in 2008, and haven't picked back up until 6 Jan 2018, on the exact same article within 45 mins of each other. I see a lot of behavioral similarities as well. I'm sure you can see how all these coincidences seem a little far fetched to an outside observer. SQL Query me!  18:37, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Unblock decline 06:26, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

 * Prospective administrator(s) reviewing this unblock request should apprise themselves of this sockpuppet investigation. Flickotown (talk) 18:49, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I notice that you haven't actually addressed the issue of the same computer being used -- the same physical device -- for exactly the same edit within 45 minutes. Where is this "corporate computer" located? Why do so many people have access to it? How did Mgtguru get there so quickly?


 * Finally, an issue which I don't think has been addressed: what's your relationship to the University of Management and Technology? What's Mgtguru's? How is it that both of you have maintained an eight-year-long relationship with the university that also happens to track the timing of both of your interests in editing Wikipedia with the same text? --Calton | Talk 01:57, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Flickotown - You have a conflict of interest as my accuser. Why are you so afraid of me to appeal to restore my account? If you are the one who was once again the accuser of an IP address as "sockpuppet" at this sockpuppet investigation, I am wondering why you are so afraid the users at a university community that has a shared IP address? And I wonder why you created your user account "Flickotown" on 23 Dec 2018 and less than 2 weeks, you became the most combating user on this university Wiki page fighting other editors, and trying to block other users? [User:Bikerun|Bikerun]] (talk) 18:13, 3 February 2019 (UTC)Bikerun

Calton - Thanks for asking questions. I believe that I have addressed all the questions you asked in above talks including these technically ones. Bikerun (talk) 18:37, 3 February 2019 (UTC)--Bikerun


 * You haven't addressed anything I just asked you. AT ALL. Don't pretend you have.


 * Flickotown - You have a conflict of interest as my accuser.
 * You have an entirely wrong and self-serving definition of "conflict of interest". And speaking of which: what's yours? --Calton | Talk 22:55, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Calton - I am not sure that you are trying to help me or to help Flickotown, my accuser, on my Talk page. Could you please let Flickotown to address my questions? As I was being blocked because of Flickotown's accusation, I have every right to ask questions to Flickotown who shown up on my Talk page to engage a Talk. In addition, why you are so angry in your Talk to me, and so eager to judge? It seems to me that you decided to side with Flickotown, so you are blind to all my explanations since 10 January. I wonder if you know Flickotown, a user that was created on 23 Dec 2018? Why this tag team display? Bikerun (talk) 23:25, 3 February 2019 (UTC) Bikerun


 * I don't know who Flickotown is or what he or she does or did. In fact, I don't give shits for any of that, so spare me the garbage "tag team" deflection. My questions have nothing to do with Flickotown.


 * so you are blind to all my explanations since 10 January
 * Once again, you haven't explained bupkis generally nor answered my questions specifically. Pretending you have isn't your best move.


 * why you are so angry in your Talk to me
 * I'm not angry -- yet -- just more and irritated at your clumsy attempts at deflection and continued refusal to answer direct questions. Which is an answer to my questions, really.


 * I have every right to ask questions to Flickotown
 * No, not really, but since all you've been doing is wasting people's time, I'm going to suggest that your talk page be locked unless you stop it. Tell your boss that he's going to have to try a different approach to PR management.--Calton &#124; Talk 04:47, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * This whole whiny conflict of interest as my accuser, whose side are you on, dodging the issues thread is wholly unconvincing you are about 0.5 mm from having talkpage access removed. Please address the issues concisely and succinctly, and without complaining about other editors. OFFS. This is a WP:checkuser block. Please read the pertinent part of the WP:GAB for more information. So far, your arguments have been wholly unconvincing so remember-- 0.5mm. User:Dlohcierekim User talk:Dlohcierekim  06:18, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * No longer 0.5 mm... talkpage access is revoked. There's no reason for administrators to waste any more time on this; the abuse of multiple accounts is obvious and evident, and in any case, appeals need to be made from the master account. Yunshui 雲 水 07:59, 5 February 2019 (UTC)