User talk:Bilalabualrub/Agonist-antagonist

Peer Review
Just a few ideas for your example column. You can identify the (mu) symbol, I am guessing it means micro. The definitions for agonist and antagonist at the beginning could use more description, to give the audience a bit more clarity. Overall, I like the neutral tone of your contribution. JazzyBen1234 (talk) 20:59, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey thanks for the feedback. So mu, in this case, is describing a class of opioid receptors. Mu opioid receptors have a higher affinity for certain ligands, specifically enkephalins and beta-endorphins. I figured it is unnecessary to go into that much detail about it, but you're right is helpful to at least clarify what mu is. As far as describing agonists and antagonists further, I am trying to come up with a way to add more meaningful information without being redundant. Also, I'm actively making sure my tone remains neutral so I'm glad it comes off as such. Bilalabualrub (talk) 20:30, 11 October 2019 (UTC)