User talk:Bilalphalia1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bilal Arif Phalia (May 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anarchyte was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bilalphalia1/Bilal Arif Phalia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Bilalphalia1/Bilal_Arif_Phalia Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anarchyte&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Bilalphalia1/Bilal_Arif_Phalia reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   04:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mirza Bilal Arif


A tag has been placed on Mirza Bilal Arif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Melcous (talk) 12:59, 19 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Information orange.svg Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Mirza Bilal Arif. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 03:57, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Bilalphalia1/Bilal Arif Phalia


Hello, Bilalphalia1. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Bilal Arif Phalia".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 23:47, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Ban proposal
Due to the persistent disruption and sockpuppetry from you, I have proposed a formal ban. You can see the proposal at Administrators' noticeboard. If you have anything to add, you can post it here and it can be copied into that discussion. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:22, 23 May 2017 (UTC)