User talk:BillKilgallon

Just to elaborate a bit here, the September Senate Bill No. 1121, Chapter 735 amendments include some confusing and contradictory language around the right to be forgotten.

The overriding declaration is:

''A business shall not discriminate against a consumer because the consumer exercised any of the consumers rights under this title, including, but not limited to, by:

... (skipped some text)

(B) Charging different prices or rates fro goods or services, including through the use of discounts or other benefits or imposing penalties''

That statement seems plain enough and no doubt lead to the original article entry. But if you continue down that same section of the legislation, you see:

(2) Nothing in this subdivision prohibits a business from charging a consumer a different price or rate for goods or services or a different level of quality of goods or services to the consuer, if that difference is reasonably related to the value provided to the consumer by the consumer's data.

These two declarations seem in direct conflict, so reverting to the overall section header statement of a right to not be discriminated against seems to be a safer assertion to make in the wiki page, rather than picking a winner between the two apparently conflicting statements.