User talk:Bill Oaf

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some articles that you might find useful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  —♦♦ SʘʘTHING  (Я)  15:07, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Double/Treble
Everytime I've seen the term "double" used in a soccer contect it means the league championship and the cup championship. In the U.S. that's MLS Cup and the Lamar Hunt Open Cup. The Lamar Hunt Open Cup has been the domestic cup competition for almost a century. MLS Cup, despite the name, is a league championship because it is only open to clubs in the league. The Supporters Shield is irrelevant which is why D.C. United can claim the first "American double" in 1996 even though they were in 3rd place in the regular season. --dm (talk) 21:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Also, a treble adds continental club championship to the double. In the U.S., that would be CONCACAF Champions Cup. No U.S. team has yet won the treble. --dm (talk) 21:48, 1 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm against including the Supporters' Shield in any definition because that's not how the media defines it, it is inconsistent with the way other countries define it, and it's a semi-official title that wasn't even awarded in the early years of the league. I have no problem with mentioning the double on the MLS Cup page, but it should be the right definition. I'd rather have nothing than incorrect info. --dm (talk) 21:54, 1 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The U.S. situation is not that unique. Yes, most leagues in Europe have an English Premiership-style single table, but others do in fact have playoffs. The league winner is the playoff winner. Many competitions offer a trophy that is called a "cup" but that doesn't make it a "cup competition". That requires a format open to clubs in different leagues and a single elimination format. In any event, I've never heard your definition of an American double before and it needs a legitimate source before it can go into an article. I can find many that say D.C. won the double in 1996. As far as the USOC declining in importance, it sadly has never been very popular. Nevertheless, it is the U.S. cup competition. --dm (talk) 22:07, 1 September 2006 (UTC)


 * FWIW I was under the impression that winning any two substantial competitions could be called by a "double" by the English-language soccer media -- e.g. some European championship and the domestic title.  Most likely the double would be as you said.   But I'm too lazy to try to substantiate this.   My opinion is that talking about "the double" is probably inappopriate in an MLS context, but saying that DCU achieved a double in such-and-such year is probably fine.  - PhilipR 01:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Re: your comment on my talk: "I guess we'll eventually end up compromising by just describing the controversy, rather than enforcing any single definition of the term" -- I agree, this is best.  It's a theoretical violation of NPOV for Wikipedia to advocate any particular interpretation of the term; instead, I think the appropriate goal is to describe the status quo.   When common usage is messy, its description may also be messy.   Do try to avoid weasel words by citing specific instances of each usage if you delve into that much detail (though probably a bit too arcane for one club's article).   Cheers, PhilipR 02:02, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

LA Galaxy
I don't regularly edit MLS articles, but because I do watch over a fair number of articles on Southern California topics, the Los Angeles Galaxy and C.D. Chivas USA are on my watchlist to try to watch over them for any vandalism.

I noticed the other day that yet another fan bulletin board was added to the LA Galaxy article. I looked at all the links, and decided that the ones that I deleted were just blather that wouldn't help the average Wikipedia reader learn anything more about the team, so they were, IMHO, useless. As What the Wikipedia is not says, the Wikipedia is not a link repository. I did keep the one official bulletin board for kids.

If having those links is the "convention" for MLS articles, I won't get into an edit war over them. I do think, however, that the issue should be hashed over at WikiProject Football/Clubs and added to their guidelines if that is case.

If you want more of my opinions on some of the unrecoreded conventions on MLS articles, see Talk:C.D. Chivas USA. Blank Verse 01:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Gals
Hi Bill Oaf.

I am a BigSoccer regular and a huge Galaxy fan. I am aware that many of us call our team the 'Gals' but I removed it from Wikipedia because, as you assumed, I thought it was derogatory.

I'm glad you put it back up, because it is a nickname that Galaxy fans call the team. That's the reality of it. Thanks.

Re: Olbermann
Your edits are definitely good. It was a mis-revert. I like your current version... cheers. --Rtrev 05:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah, consensus :) Bill Oaf 05:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Kit
The kit _thinredsides has a transparent body, so whatever value you set for body= will show as the main body colour. ed g2s &bull; talk 09:39, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * File was using full transparency. Fixed. See PNG. ed g2s &bull; talk 09:58, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Pekerman
Actually, I didn't even notice the Pekerman addition until you pointed it out. There was an article last month in the Washington Post that he was the leading candidate and recent articles in Argentina and Mexico have also stated that the signing is almost done. For now, I still consider this to be in the rumor stage. Scottmsg 13:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Football in the USA and Canada
Please visit WikiProject/List of proposed projects if you want to be a part of WikiProject Football(soccer) in the USA and Canada. The page is still under construction. XYZ CrVo 02:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The page for WP Soccer and America User:XYZ CrVo/WikiProject Football (soccer) in the USA and Canada is up and running,

but still in its beginning stages. Please leave any comments on the talk page of the project. XYZ CrVo 02:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

RE: disambig standard

 * Good point. A standard should be made. When a soccer and football player share the same name it would probably be best to have it Eddie Johnson(MLS and US National team) and Eddie Johnson(NFL and AFL). This would eliminate some confusion and be more informative. It would also avoid the football soccer problem. What are your thoughts on this? XYZ CrVo 16:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)


 * What do you think of the Project page? Did I miss anything? I know its very crude.


 * Well if he goes and plays for England that could be added. I just realized that tags should be added for current and retired players as well as the league they currently play in. Eddie Johnson(MLS and National team- Current; USL-former); Coby Jones (US national team- former; MLS- Current)

Re: Toronto FC accident
i'm a bit of a wikipedia noob but i was basically trying to rv the page becuz the roster was a little messed up. Im not quite sure wat happened though as all looks fine to me Soccer fan 02:18, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

PDL Disambiguation Pages
Thank you so much for doing all the disambig work on the PDL team pages. It's something I was about to start doing myself but you seem to have the system down! Between the two of us (*and the other people who contribute, of course), hopefully we can make these pages a definitive, and ACCURATE, world-wide source for minor league soccer in the US.

Oh, and while I'm here, about the PDL team categorisation. I think we both agree that "professional" is the way to go, although I've had no actual response from JYardley. While the PDL is not strictly a professional league in the way MLS, USL1, or the top leagues in Europe are, it is certainly much more than a youth team, especially as players as old as 30 can - and have - played for PDL teams at the end of their careers. Jurgen Klinsmann is a prime example. So, I'm going to keep adding them to the Pro ranks as and when I find out more information.

And as far as I know, Crystal Palace Baltimore is now going to USL2. It hasn't been formally announced yet, but it is pretty much a given, so I changed the team page to reflect that. --JonBroxton 00:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

WP Munich
 Hello,

You are invited to join WikiProject Munich!

There are a lot of things to do in this project. From creating new articles to finetuning articles into featured article status.

How can you help?
 * You can join a Task Force.
 * You can help comform Munich-related articles to Wikipedia Policy.
 * You can get free Munich-related images under GNU Free Documentation License.
 * You can create and edit of Munich-related articles.
 * You can do translations from German Wikipedia to English Wikipedia on Munich-related articles.
 * You can help do assessments of Munich-related articles.
 * You can help expand articles currently in the Stub-class and Start-class.
 * You can help reference articles.
 * Since original research is against Wikipedia policy, you can research topics to expand. This means you don't need to know anything about Munich.
 * You can help expand stubs and start-class articles and help finetune other articles into Featured article status.

A WikiProject of this nature is very broad. Munich has a rich history in sports, culture, politics along with many more topics. Feel free to help out in your area of interest.

If you want to check the project out you can click the link above. If you want to join the project, you can sign up here.

If you have any questions feel free to contact myself or any other member of the project.



Orphaned fair use image (Image:Mls cup2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mls cup2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  howcheng  {chat} 03:43, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey
Hey Bill, I just wanted to thank you for all the contributions you've made to Metro/RBNY articles. I don't know if you're aware of my contributions to Wikipedia, but I was responsible for a large percentage of MLS articles. Then I saw all the idiotic in-fighting, and I quit, coming back sporadically to make changes when players got transfered and editors missed it, or to update the MetroStars page, and list of foreign MLS players. Then there was a ridiculous move to wipe out the Metro page altogether, so I came back and tried to fight it. And since then, I've contributed here and there, usually from an IP. But at this point, first after withstanding an idiotic fight against an editor who did not think Ubiparipolic was Bosnian, and now with someone wanting to wipe out the MetroStars name from List of foreign players, the one page I tried my best to keep up-to-date and complete... All I can say is F it. There is a reason Wikipedia is getting a bad wrap. And all these people who try to erase history... Pathetic. But if it's in you, keep fighting the good fight. I just don't know if it's worth it for me. DR31 (talk) 14:30, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Jeff Parke
Thanks for that - I saw the #60 thing but I didn't know whether there was a reliable source for it. Ytny (talk) 17:04, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Curt_Onalfo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Curt_Onalfo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Mls_cup2.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mls_cup2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 10:50, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Jacob Thomas (soccer)
Absolutley love your edit to the article on December 5, 2006! Thanks for having a sense of humor. м info 23:28, 9 September 2007 (UTC)


 * : D Bill Oaf (talk) 19:33, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Supporters shield.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Supporters shield.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 03:47, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Unused football kit
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:19, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Mls listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mls. Since you had some involvement with the Mls redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. &#60;&#60;&#60; SOME GADGET GEEK &#62;&#62;&#62; (talk) 13:31, 31 January 2016 (UTC)