User talk:Bill sneed

E Corbett
Hi - I have removed your addition. IMO it was opinionated and undue - not WP:NPOV compliant or and neither were the supporting externals used WP:RS compliant - five www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill primary senate loga and tow secondary externals that dod not mention the subjects name once - you are welcomeTalk:Ellen Corbett to discuss on the talkpage and see others opinions - there may be a case to add a mention. - Please be aware, wikipedia is not a place to make political partisan edits, thanks -  You really can  17:13, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

again removed
Please do not repeatedly replace disputed content into the biography of a living person. Please follow WP:BRD and move to discussion.  You really can  17:32, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

There is nothing to dispute. Senator Corbett did a "gut and amend" of her bill SB 134 that was to "Save San Leandro Hospital" and replaced the language with SB 175. It is verifiable from my links to an official legislative webpage. All the information was accurate. The fact that you blocked it is outrageous. Facts are facts. Please point out what information was incorret? If you can point that out, then I'll drop the issue, but it's all factual. You are abusing your authority and I will take this to dispute resolution process if not reversed. --Bill sneed (talk) 00:20, 13 January 2012 (UTC)Bill Sneed


 * We don't report on things using multiple primary externals such as this one http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/sen/sb_0101-0150/sb_134_bill_20110830_amended_asm_v96.html - we basically report on what Wikipedia reliable sources have already reported by writing in our own words and using the source to support it. If you find a few that mention Corbett in then we can look at adding something, but it must be neutral - you should consider adding some reasons that caused her to do this also.  You really can  00:32, 13 January 2012 (UTC)


 * If you can presents some good quality reliable newspaper articles and reports I will investigate them and look to writing something for inclusion that is neutral and wiki policy compliant about the issue.  You really can  00:35, 13 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Digging through the State Senate records to keep tabs on politicians is commendable, but it's also original research. You took a bunch of different sources, and used them to reach a new conclusion that isn't in any of them. That's clearly against policy. Wikipedia isn't a newspaper, or a blog, or a site for new political analysis.-LtNOWIS (talk) 02:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
Actually, you have been told on your talk-page where the problem lies: you gather information faom various sources...and then reach your own conclusions, which you proceed to insert into the article. Lay back a bit and try to understand what we are trying to tell you.

Lectonar (talk) 09:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Indefinite block
Blocked indefinitely as one of a number of socks with an agenda concerning Ellen Corbett. User:Fred Bauder Talk 20:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)