User talk:Billabong22391

A tag has been placed on Andrew Saul, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -FisherQueen (Talk) 04:08, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

re: Andrew Saul
Seven months too late, but I have to say, whomever tagged the article did a very, very, very bad job of following the guideline for tagging articles. A CEO of two major corporations, who happens to head a Federal Agency requiring Senate confirmation and managing $200 billion dollars in retirement funds for 4 million soldiers and Federal Employees? Coupled with the fact that notability is only a guideline, and not a policy, the deleting admin is also at fault. People need to check google, and start expanding stubs or requesting expansion instead of being so trigger happy. Sorry your hard work was deleted Billabong22391, we hope you'll rejoin us some day. Luckily the article is back up now, and it's there to stay. MrPrada 08:19, 11 August 2007 (UTC)