User talk:Billkhan

May 2008
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you've been adding your signature to some of your article contributions. This is a simple mistake to make and is easy to correct. For future reference, the need to associate edits with users is taken care of by an article's edit history. Therefore, you should use your signature only when contributing to talk pages, the Village Pump, or other such discussion pages. For a better understanding of what distinguishes articles from these type of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thanks for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:28, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Advertising
The article Kentessa.com has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

To clarify you've also failed to cite 3rd party references which are specifically about "Kentessa" as required by our Notability (organizations and companies) guidelines. Posting links to your competitors' websites or articles on CNN about your target market do not automatically mean your company is notable enough to warrant inclusion on Wikipedia. Please see Conflict of interest for further details. --  Netsnipe  ►  11:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Sky International School and College for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sky International School and College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sky International School and College until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm  (talk)  07:30, 24 November 2019 (UTC)