User talk:Billlion

archive

photos of alan turing building
Hi. Now that it's summer (you wanted to wait for a sunny day...) maybe you would be able to take some new photos? both inside and outside are more finished now. regards, Marmelad (talk) 20:08, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Ole Nydahl article
Hello, I see that you have been active in editing the Ole Nydahl article. Recently it seems that unbalanced edits are being made to this article, mainly that well-sourced quotes are being removed from the controversies section of the article. I have recently reverted some of these edits before creating this account, but I can only do so much without breaking the 3 revert rule. I ask that you help keep the article balanced, and in accord with Wikipedia guidelines.

Best regards, 87.56.199.8 (talk) 01:12, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Oxford Brookes University Logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Oxford Brookes University Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:44, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

JCM telescope
this article, on which you have edited, contains a statement re. the completion of scuba-2 in early 2008. this needs updating. is the detector online? thx.Toyokuni3 (talk) 14:33, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry I don't know.Billlion (talk) 14:52, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Palace_westminster_pano_corrected.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Palace_westminster_pano_corrected.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:23, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Nice work with electrical impedance tomography
Good work with the EIT article. I found it to be surprisingly informative and well-written given the relatively small number of editors who have given it attention. I did make a few fixups mostly to bring it into conformity with MoS. Robert K S (talk) 18:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Ancoats
I think the URL in question is www.mm2manchester.com. Whether it's any good as a source, I have no idea. Regards, Mr Stephen (talk) 18:11, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

higher-dimensional Möbius transformations
Hi Billion -- I've added a comment at Talk:Möbius_transformation regarding higher-dimensional Möbius transformations. Joriki (talk) 08:57, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

4th floor Alan Turing
Hi Bill, the 4th floor is not just plant space, there is a kitchen, 3 large labs, clean room, shielded room, network hub room, server room, cleaners cupboard and a loo ;-) -  All 'user space' so I think is worth including. Cheers, Ant Holloway.
 * Thanks, you are right my mistake. Is it documented somewhere?Billlion (talk) 18:19, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Fish at Lakes Aquarium Cumbria.jpg
My pleasure to help you illustrate your article. Thanks for the Flickr courtesy note. Computerjoe 's talk 17:11, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your input at the SSEM article on the thorny issue of what arithmetic operations it implemented. I'm conscious that I may be too close to it to always be entirely objective, and perhaps sometimes too protective, but I was deeply unhappy about the recent addition. --Malleus Fatuorum 23:24, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I hope I added to the clarity. Its not clear to everyone that subtraction and conditional branching is enough so it could be explained a bit better.Billlion (talk) 23:28, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree, and thanks once again for clarifying what I must admit I thought was obvious. --Malleus Fatuorum 23:30, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Help
Hi, I'm posting this on your (and other members of the Maths Wikiproject) talk as we need editors who are knowledgeable about Mathematics to evaluate the following discussion and check out the editors and articles affected. Please follow the link below and comment if you can help.

Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents.

Thankyou. Exxolon (talk) 18:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Please look at Radon transform
Hi. Could you please have a look over at Radon transform. There is an editor insistent upon adding another reference to the article, to a recent book by Gabor Herman. (This same editor, incidentally, is spamming the same reference over many related articles.) Initially I removed it because it already has enough references&mdash;many of which were presumably used in writing it, some were added awhile back by you I think. The editor then re-inserted the reference, claiming on my talk page that it was superior to the others (a dubious claim that I have replied to). At any rate, while I will certainly defend my decision to remove the reference, I'm ultimately not that invested in it one way or the other. An outside opinion would be helpful here. Thanks, Sławomir Biały  (talk) 16:40, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * See Talk:Radon transformBilllion (talk) 19:28, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Billlion! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:23, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Doug Scott -

math notation
Hello. This edit prompts some comments.

TeX is sophisticated. If you write 4 \mathrm{sup}_f A, it looks like this:
 * $$ 4 \mathrm{sup}_f A\, $$
 * $$ 4 \mathrm{sup}_f A\, $$

But if you write 4 \sup_f A, it looks like this: The difference is not only that the &fnof; appears directly under "sup", but also that spacing before and after "sup" is automatically provided according to standard style conventions (note the space between 4 and sup in the second case and the lack of such space in the first case), and in some contexts, the size gets adjusted according to standard usages. Michael Hardy (talk) 03:54, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * $$ 4 \sup_f A\, $$
 * $$ 4 \sup_f A\, $$
 * Thanks Michael, that was a subtlety I missed.Billlion (talk) 06:17, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:14, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Billlion (talk) 06:18, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:CT of human thorax showing current paths for EIT.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:CT of human thorax showing current paths for EIT.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 00:29, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed Tibetan naming conventions
A few months ago, I posted a new proposal for Tibetan naming conventions, i.e. conventions that can be used to determine the most appropriate titles for articles related to the Tibetan region. This came out of discussions about article titles on Talk:Qamdo and Talk:Lhoka (Shannan) Prefecture. I hope that discussions on the proposal's talk page will lead to consensus in favour of making these conventions official, but so far only a few editors have left comments. If you would be interested in taking a look at the proposed naming conventions and giving your opinion, I would definitely appreciate it. Thanks &mdash; Nat Krause(Talk!·What have I done?) 22:08, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Françoise Tisseur
Thanks for the changes you've made to the article. If you add a stub template to an article then it's a good idea to check the talk page to see what class the article was carrying. It was listed as a start-class. I've changed that to stub-class to avoid inconsistencies. It's worth making sure you check the talk page before making changes to articles. Thanks again for the edits, and keep up the good work. — Fly by Night  ( talk )  03:22, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 11:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * ThanksBilllion (talk) 13:08, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Category:Mathematical physicists
Hi,

for some strange reason, Jean Ginibre appears in the category under 'J' (and not under 'G'). Do you accidentally know how to fix this? (I am asking you since you created the category, I apologise if this is the completely wrong address).

Best, Sasha (talk) 03:32, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I fixed it with the Defaultsort template, have a look and see how I did that. Billlion (talk) 05:41, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * thanks!Sasha (talk) 05:50, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Isn't that other article a POV fork?
Re 'Mongol invasions'. There are 2 POVs. The Tibetan religious historical tradition see negotiations with the Mongols from 1206 to 1251 as precluding invasion by an agreement between the Mongols as the Sa-skya religious authority. The essentially Sinocentric view cites a cavalry incursion that burnt two monasteries to the north of Lhasa and killed several hundred monks in 1240 as an 'invasion'. 34 years ago, Wylie showed these are just POVs simplying a period which, for the obscurity of testimonies, we know little about, and the misinformation is repeated in many secondary sources. But it is certain that there was no 'Mongol invasion' of Tibet (the whole ununified plateau) in the sense that there was a Mongol invasion of 19 other countries in that century. The 'main article' is no such thing. It cites a few sources, but is thinner in substantive detail than the History of Tibet section I was editing. A lot of these pages seem intent on establishing retroactively the modern Chinese case for sovereignty over Tibet (which it indeed now exercises) on the basis of (a)Mongols unified China (b)Tibet acceded to Mongol claims for submission (c)therefore China's claim to Tibet dates from these invents. On this principle, China's soverenty extends to Hunbgary and Baghdad. I'm not interested in POV battles. I'm interested in what the best academic intelligence says about the specific facts of any period, and the word 'invasion' here is inappropriate.Nishidani (talk) 13:27, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I see your argument and it certainly has a lot of merit, but I think you should edit the main article first Mongol invasions of Tibet(especially change the title to Mongol incursions in to Tibet) even if it is a fairly poor atrticle, or at least have the debate on the talk page and then change History of Tibet to agree. As you say you will be up against editors who seem to advocate a view that supports the Chinese calim to soverenty over Tibet on that atricle as well. Perhaps citing academic articles that confirm at least that there are two points of view might be the way forward?Billlion (talk) 14:50, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Metal detector split tag
I am trying to clear up the backlog of split tags. Taking a quick look, I think the proposal to split the article was opposed and would therefore have removed the split tag. If you have a clear idea on what you want then I suggest that you do it, otherwise the split tag ought to go. It has been on rather a long time. regards Op47 (talk) 18:31, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I suggest we drop the split tag. I only know about certain non-controversial aspects of metal detectors and it needs some diplomacy and understanding to do the split well, so as to reduce rather than fuel edit wars. Billlion (talk) 23:10, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:The Stork stalactite at Treak Cavern.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Stork stalactite at Treak Cavern.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 21:30, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Akong Tulku Rinpoche throne.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Akong Tulku Rinpoche throne.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:59, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks I have changed the tag to GFDL-self to make it unambiguous. I think the message is a bit strange as it seems to ask fro a source, as though copying images  from other websites rather than making them oneself was the norm. Billlion (talk) 16:45, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Bach, Cotton, Lanczos, Schouten tensors
Hi Billlion. I noticed you are one of few active editors to have meaningfully edited the Cotton tensor article. I've recently made some major changes to the Lanczos tensor article. Perhaps you'd be interested in improving it or know someone else who is. Similar pages that could use some attention are Bach tensor and Schouten tensor. Teply (talk) 23:41, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

File:George Henry Livens cropped.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:George Henry Livens cropped.jpg

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 22:56, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

CFD
Hi Billlion -- I posted the Adams Prize recipients category on CFD for discussion; per WP:OCAT, award winners are usually better listed on the award pages rather than categorized. Please feel free to join the discussion; notice + link is posted below. --Lquilter (talk) 02:27, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Metal detector, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Little Big Horn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

commons:File:Dr Akong Tulku Rinpoche.jpg
If you created this file, please mark it with or something similar so we know who the author is. Thanks. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 09:06, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok done 18:44, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=599263830 your edit] to Landweber iteration may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:51, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=599264024 your edit] to Landweber iteration may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:53, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Minor edits
This edit should not have been marked as minor. Anything that chops around the substantive text of the aricle is not minor, even if nothing new was added. Anything that another editor may want to revert (and this certainly met that category) is not minor. You seem to be doing this quite a lot: I did not have to look far into your history to find these example breaches of WP:MINOR: (adding a visible tag),  (adding content - and by the way that edit has at least two spelling errors so other editors will certainly want to look at it),  (changing meaning),  (removing an external link). Please take the time to read the guideline.  Spinning Spark  14:17, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The edit you referred to is the movement of one sentence to a different section. It is very much out of place. Please have a look at that edit, as I have reverted your revert.   I think you are wrong in that case but you might be right in some of the others. Not that you are not immune to spelllling mistakies yourself (see above) ;-).  Billlion (talk) 14:36, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I am not wrong, you are. First of all, please check the article history, I made several subsequent edits, all of which you reverted, some of which made completely separate contributions, and one of which fixed (properly) the issue you are complaining about.  Your version on the other hand reads as if optical filters are used to filter cyclones from weather data.  Do you actually know anything about filters?  You cannot make an optical filter to filter week long periods because those frequencies are not within the optical band.  Your edit is completely incompetent.  I politely request that you self-revert it.
 * You also need to read WP:BRD. Redoing an edit that has been reverted is the beginnings of edit warring and is extremely poor behaviour for an editor that has been around as long as you.
 * The point about the spelling errors was not to beat you up for making them, but that you had marked the edit as minor so other editors who might otherwise have seen and corrected them will not look bcause of the minor mark. My spelling errors here are completely irrelevant and unimportant and it is rather churlish of you to point them out.  Yours, on the other hand, are in article space and your first response should have been to hustle on over there and fix them rather than start an edit war with me.  Spinning  Spark  15:26, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:MINOR "and rearrangements of text without modification of its content." I just moved a sentence. There is certainly no spelling mistake in moving a sentence. It is not an edit war and I do not like the tone your are adopting. Please feel free to move the sentence to somewhere where it might be better to mention optical filters, perhaps it deserves another section. Billlion (talk) 17:53, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I have read WP:MINOR and fully understand it. You added the word "and" (as well as adding the sentence to an entirely inappropriate paraagraph).  That has made a crucial difference to the meaning of the whole paragraph and is thus NOT a minor edit.  From WP:MINOR " any change that affects the meaning of an article is not minor, even if the edit concerns a single word".  I already did move the sentence you object to somewhere else but YOU REVERTED ME, along with some additional explanation.  That might well explain some of my tone you don't like.  Once again, please CHECK THE EDIT HISTORY and self-revert.  Alternatively, if you have some objection to this version of the article, please explain what it is on the talk page.  Spinning  Spark  18:30, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * ...and besides that, you were wrong to restore your version without discussion after you were reverted however right you are.  Spinning Spark  18:49, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Photo of Dave
Thanks for making a good start with David Broomhead's article. Do you have a photo that we could use?- ideally something for which you have the rights, and we could add to WP:COMMONS. Also, other than his home-page and the two given, do you know of any sources we could use to expand the article? U+003F? 22:08, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * We are working on it. There will be some official obituaries published and they will serve as authoritative sources, and we will see if we can find a photo which we can make open. Billlion (talk) 06:06, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I added a couple of photos to the commons. Let me know if you have any others, especially from his younger years. Do you know if the school will be releasing an obituary? U+003F? 12:18, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Mark Muldoon wrote a nice obituary that just came out in the LMS newsletter.Billlion (talk) 15:52, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Yeshe Losal
Hi there. I've tidied up and hopefully fixed the cut and paste issue. The article (along with its talk page) is now at Yeshe Losal per the style guide. Cheers, Philg88 ♦talk 08:39, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help User:Philg88. I will go back to the Talk and try to explain the article naming style guide.Billlion (talk) 10:06, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Technika SH-Z625 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Technika SH-Z625 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Technika SH-Z625 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ubcule (talk) 22:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Electrical Impedance Tomography Reconstruction Software for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Electrical Impedance Tomography Reconstruction Software is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Electrical Impedance Tomography Reconstruction Software until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 01:47, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of MAGIC (postgraduate mathematics)


The article MAGIC (postgraduate mathematics) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable organization.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Please claim your upload(s): File:Mirror_Dinghy_on_Combs_Reservoir.jpg
Hi, This media was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices,

However, due to changes in the copyright situation in some jurisdictions, there is a need to ensure media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed. It would be appreciated if you were able to confirm that it was your own work, by marking it as own, Fully completeing the information block, and leaving an acknowledgement on the file description page to indicate that you've accepted the license shown (and updated the information accordingly. If you have other uploads, please consider "claiming" them in a similar manner, You can find a list of files you have created [ here].

If you don't want to keep your media on English Wikipedia, please nominate it for deletion under Criteria G7 of the Criteria for Speedy deletion ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:47, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Please claim your upload(s): File:Leopard slug 11cm.jpg
Hi, This media was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices,

However, due to changes in the copyright situation in some jurisdictions, there is a need to ensure media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed. It would be appreciated if you were able to confirm that it was your own work, by marking it as own, Fully completeing the information block, and leaving an acknowledgement on the file description page to indicate that you've accepted the license shown (and updated the information accordingly. If you have other uploads, please consider "claiming" them in a similar manner, You can find a list of files you have created [ here].

If you don't want to keep your media on English Wikipedia, please nominate it for deletion under Criteria G7 of the Criteria for Speedy deletion ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:47, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Also:
 * File:Lama Yeshe Losal Rinpoche portrait.jpgShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:41, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Samye ling stupa and statue.jpg
You uploaded, File:Samye ling stupa and statue.jpg, where you either stated or implied that you had permission of a third party to upload it; or that evidence of such permission would be provided on request.

Unless there's some record of that permission, it's harder to confirm if any given permission is genuine. Wikipedia currently needs the permission to be explicitly proven at the time of upload, and recorded in the OTRS permission queue, for this reason.

Please read Requesting copyright permission, which advises on how to confirm permissions you obtained from a third party.

It is also advisable to ask the third-party what source attribution they desire, as opposed to marking the image as having been "sent personally".

If permission is not confirmed, and recorded as detailed above, the media may have to be removed so that Wikipedia stays in compliance with copyright law and policy in some jurisdictions.

File:Mirror Dinghy on Combs Reservoir.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mirror Dinghy on Combs Reservoir.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Also:
 * File:Lama Yeshe Losal Rinpoche portrait.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Mwala School moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Mwala School, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -- Wright  Streetdeck  09:21, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks User:Streetdeck. I had not used the phone interface before and was working on low bandwidth in Africa so I saved the article prematurely in error. I think it is pretty much ready now. Billlion (talk) 16:16, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Sir Horace Lamb Chair for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sir Horace Lamb Chair is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sir Horace Lamb Chair until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92Talk 18:53, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Race and intelligence discretionary sanctions notice

 * Truly no implication here, I am just making sure anyone who has edited Race and intelligence in the past two weeks has been properly alerted. Barkeep49 (talk) 05:02, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mwala School (April 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mwala School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mwala School, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mwala_School Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Curb_Safe_Charmer&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mwala_School reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:03, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice
Hi, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mwala School


Hello, Billlion. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mwala School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 14:59, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Akong Rinpoche
Thanks for the advice. Still trying to find my feet so will stick with one page for the moment. I've been mainly checking info and inserting citations. I am finding that on a biographical page most of the information cited either comes directly from the subject himself or those associated with him. I've tried looking at academic papers but to be honest, if you look at them most tend to cite the same sources. I didn't think Wikipedia would accept personal blogs etc as credible independent sources because when I try to add a link to an academic paper it wasn't accepted because the site hosted personal blogs which were not deemed credible. However, I will take on board your advice and try to find more independent sources as you suggest to ensure that there is no bias. Have a great day.
 * Hi User:Sarahcannell‬ yeah it is hard to get biographical sources of recent people. Newspaper sources are often useful at least to establish dates, but so often they actually just parrot a press release. Obituaries in newspapers may help in this case? How about reputable Buddhist magazines that might have run a biography but are not connected to a specific tradition? Also Government web sites in England and Scotland for the registration of Charities can at least confirm dates when things were founded.  By the way when you leave a message like this you can sign it by typing four tilde things which it expands to a link to your talk page etc. Like this: Billlion (talk) 13:55, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Billlion, sounds like a stupid question, but can I can add references from other Wikipedia pages? Sarahcannell (talk) 16:06, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Absolutely, you can just copy and paste the template code from the citation (thing between curly brackets or ref tags) if it supports what you are saying in this article. Could save a lot of work. Note how I started this reply with a colon and that just indents the reply. I see you mastered the tilde things! Billlion (talk) 17:23, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Deletion Article for Richard Kerner
A page of which you have either commented or contributed has been nominated for deletion. Please visit its deletion talk page of a consensus here. Thanks, Mausebru (talk) 14:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive
 Hello :

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a  month long Backlog Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is currently a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

WP:AFC Helper News
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest. Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
 * The template db-afc-move has been created - this template is similar to db-move when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

File permission problem with File:List of principals of Mwala School up to 2020.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:List of principals of Mwala School up to 2020.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 02:23, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)