User talk:Billuconn11

Welcome!

 * }

Proposed deletion of L. Joseph Bajek


The article L. Joseph Bajek has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 03:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


 * It's generally a bad idea to create placeholder pages. It's better to get your sources organized, draft the text, and then create the page—that way, even when the page starts out, it's got reliable sources and a clear indication of notability. —C.Fred (talk) 03:06, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

I'm new to Wikipedia and have been trying to add content to areas that I have knowledge in. I recently added this page for l. Joseph Bajek. I was trying to create a holding page so that the link from the list of eagle scout page would work. When I first put it out there it was incomplete, but I have added more data and referneces. Another user is going to add more content. I hope this article will not be deleted as I think the objections that were made to the article have been addressed.

Nomination of L. Joseph Bajek for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article L. Joseph Bajek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/L. Joseph Bajek until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 03:39, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with L. Joseph Bajek. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 03:53, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Thomas Mercaldo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Mercaldo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Thomas Mercaldo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 03:19, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Aquinas Consulting for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aquinas Consulting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aquinas Consulting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 03:21, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Do not create, add, or restore hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did with the article Wild Adirondack Cow. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 03:32, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Billuconn11/Wild Adirondack Cow
User:Billuconn11/Wild Adirondack Cow, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Billuconn11/Wild Adirondack Cow and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Billuconn11/Wild Adirondack Cow during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BDD (talk) 22:55, 5 May 2014 (UTC)