User talk:BillyGambela

African American
Please stop adding unsourced information to the article. As the article says, in the United States a person is considered African American if they have sub-Saharan ancestry. Not Northern African, and not Middle Eastern. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Your source says nothing of the sort. Please stop. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:37, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Are you a racist?? or could it be you are not reading the citations:

I Have Ancestry in the 4 Locations mentioned Above among Others.

One who is a so called African American Could Have Origins in West Asia From Having a West Asia Origin

That has Migration into Africa or From Africa migrating to West Asia‘a Middle East…

The Haplogroups L2a1, L3* have an African Origin and West Asia migrations..

The Haplogroups M1, U are Considered to be Asiatic with Migrations Into Africa from West Asia..

Now to respectfully answer your inquiry, what would my Origin be under theses circumstances..

I belong to mtDna Haplogroup L2a1 which has Migrations from Ethiopia, Nubia, Egypt and Yemen @ 33,700 B.P..

My Father belongs to Haplogroup M2, which has Migrations from Africa to Asia back into Africa Over 30,000 B.P.

Both of my Haplogroups have an African Origin..

They Both have the Highest Frequency between Nubia/Egypt..

Haplogroup L2a1 has 13% Among Ethiopians, 20% Egypt/Nile Valley Nubians and 6% Among Yemenis

Haplogroup M2 has a frequency of 39.1% in Nubia and 27.3% Egypt and 3.7% in Lebanon, 3.4% Ethiopia and 5% in Oman.

Both of these Haplogroups are almost Ubiquitous in their Migrations from East to West or North to South…

With Notable frequencies

(excerpt from ethiopian mtdna study)

mtDNA lineages of “Ethiopian, Egyptian, and Yemeni” populations, the MDS plot (fig. 3) Clustered, Together with Egyptians,

So My Origins in this case is Africa, and my Extended Migrations Includes my Asiatic African Brothers and Sisters..

(Hebrews, Arabs, the Sabaeans, Yemenis and Omani)

My Ethnicity would be Asiatic-African and Nationality is Nubian-Egyptian American. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_American

Note: Nubia’s/Kush or Cush that I belong to shares the Same Genetic Ancestry and Markers

HVR1- Migration of Haplotypes (sp40 L2a1)

086C-West Asia/ North Africa

223T-Eastern Africa

278T-Central East Africa

294T- Central Western Africa

309G- Horn of Africa/North Africa/West Asia

368C- South West Asia, Asia

519C – West Asia/North Africa/Eurasia

HVR2 differences from CRS o 73G o 146C o 152C o 195C o 263G

NOTE: MY HV1 AND HV2 sequences are ethnic matches for

The Mitochondrial Control Region of Nubians, Egyptians and Hebrews

The Egyptian Population Data set has a Low Random Match Probability..

The Egyptian Population also shows a Large number of Unique Haplotypes,

Therefore indicating a High mtDna Diversity within the Country…

THIS IS SCIENTIFIC PROOF!!!! ALL SOCALLED AFRICAN AMERICAN DO NOT COME FROM SLAVERY OR WEST AFRICA!!!

February 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on African American. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dougweller (talk) 05:54, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
 * 3) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at African American. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - 2/0 (cont.) 06:34, 16 February 2011 (UTC) During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

African American
Do you really want to be blocked again? Please stop and discuss your proposed changes at Talk:African American. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:57, 17 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia anyone can edit. This is a collaborative project, built by a consensus of all involved editors. Your recent edits to African American have been disputed; your continued insistence on their inclusion after yesterday's block is still edit warring, and you may be blocked again if you persist. I have started a section at the talkpage for discussion. Please do not continue to add the disputed material until there is general agreement that it is factually correct and improves the article. Thank you, - 2/0 (cont.) 20:46, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on African American. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''You can be blocked at any time if you continue this way. I am not interested in discussions by email, you must discuss this on the article talk page and get consensus for your edits. That's the way we work. Your sources must explicitly back your edits, you can't use them to argue your point.'' Dougweller (talk) 21:34, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
 * 3) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 55 hours for edit warring, as you did at African American. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - 2/0 (cont.) 22:07, 17 February 2011 (UTC) During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Haplogroup E1b1a (Y-DNA), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nubian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)