User talk:BillyWorld1015

July 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hell Yeah, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hell Yeah was changed by BillyWorld1015 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863723 on 2011-07-15T21:09:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:09, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Freight Train Jane


A tag has been placed on Freight Train Jane requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 14:31, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

More information needed about File:Tattoo Van Halen.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tattoo Van Halen.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:


 * 1) Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
 * 2) Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Tattoo Van Halen.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tattoo Van Halen.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:40, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

More information needed about File:Black N Blue.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Black N Blue.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:


 * 1) Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
 * 2) Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Black N Blue Performing Live.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Black N Blue Performing Live.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:44, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

More information needed about File:Black N Blue Hell Yeah.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Black N Blue Hell Yeah.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:


 * 1) Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
 * 2) Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

More information needed about File:Black N Blue Rarities.jpeg
Hello, !

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:Black N Blue Rarities.jpeg. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

More information needed about File:Black N Blue Collected.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Black N Blue Collected.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:


 * 1) Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
 * 2) Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Jettblack - Raining Rock 2012 Album Cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Jettblack - Raining Rock 2012 Album Cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:21, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Reviews from reliable sources only please
http://musicenthusiastmag.com does not appear to be a site that supports professional reviewers. I could be wrong though and you could request a review of the site at the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. I reverted your recent additions based on that assumption. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

I did as you said, I got a response from another contributor who said although it was odd that the website doesn't currently have an "About us" tab or something similar, and typically Wikipedia will be looking for rock reviews from more mainstream sources such as Rolling Stone and The New York Times, "It is not compulsory that all reviewers be professional journalists, but normally they will be". Considering these said articles have little to no critical reception links, and keeping in mind this response I received, I went back and undid your revisions. (talk) 08:24, 29 May 2013 (EST)


 * Please leave it out until the discussion winds its way down. It's clearly not a RS. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:22, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

That is your opinion, but not fact. The discussion from the Reliable Sources page regarding this particular source has now been archived. During that said discussion, we only received a response from one other editor, who said "It is not compulsory that all reviewers be professional journalists, but normally they will be". After looking at similar posts on the Reliable Sources page, they all come up with the same conclusion: it can be added, if there are few to no other review sources included in an article, but should make way for more mainstream sources if/when they become available. After looking at more recent posts on the source in question, there are some coming from other writers such as a Heather Wright. Upon further inspection of the site, I found the website's About page, which says it was formed by a William Clark, who is also currently a professional staff writer with Guitar International Magazine. Your main opinion that you expressed in the Reliable Sources page was these reviews weren't coming from professional writers, which I have just disproved. Keeping the opinions I expressed earlier in mind, there is absolutely no logical reason as to why these reviews cannot be included in the professional reception columns in Wikipedia articles. (talk) 17:35, 04 June 2013 (EST)


 * Actually, now it's a fact: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_149. The fact that no other editors supported its notability. That's all it takes. Please stop adding the source. If you want to start the discussion again, feel free and be sure to invite me to discuss. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:42, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Question for you
Hi, I noticed several of your edits recently on albums by Queensryche and Deep Purple, and on Black Sabbath's new "God is Dead?" single, among other articles. You seem to be particularly interested in adding reviews from Music Enthusiast Magazine. Might I ask if you are affiliated with this source in any way? (Also, just to be clear, I don't see any clear issue with the source, at least not from taking a quick look at the site)--L1A1 FAL (talk) 23:34, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for reaching out, but no, I'm not in any way affiliated with Music Enthusiast Magazine. I'm sorry if I seem particularly interested in using that one particular source, I do try to add review links to multiple different sources when I add them to the reception sections of articles. I'll try to make a more conscious effort to reach out to other sources, not just Music Enthusiast Magazine. talk 21:50, 9 June 2013 (EST)

Nomination of Hell Yeah! (Black 'n Blue album) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hell Yeah! (Black 'n Blue album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hell Yeah! (Black 'n Blue album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:04, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Queensrÿche (album), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ''You reverted a series of good edits to make a point that your favourite blog belongs on Wikipedia. What a childish thing to do.'' Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:14, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I subsequently restored the interview. Rather than have me determine if it's WP:RS or not, I just tagged it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:26, 7 August 2013 (UTC)


 * I reverted an edit, which had you removing a source which actually benefited the article. I personally do not understand what problem you have with my contributions. Your main concern which you voiced regarding the source in question was that there was an unknown factor, involving whether or not the material was being written by more than one person, and if these same persons are professional writers. A simple glance at the source's "About" page clearly provides the answer to both of these questions: the answer being that yes, the material at said source is being written by a staff of professional writers and contributors. You are now going back through all of my contributions to Wikipedia, removing this source simply because you personally feel it does not need to be on Wikipedia, and again this source benefits the article by providing additional critical reception, and now you are even going back to articles I created several months ago on albums by well known established and credible artists and nominating them for deletion. On top of this you are calling my edits "childish". I am respectfully requesting for you to stop these behaviors and actions. BillyWorld1015 11:24, 12 August 2013 (EST)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Black N Blue Rarities.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Black N Blue Rarities.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 18 November 2021 (UTC)