User talk:Billy Brough

Futtergate
A "" template has been added to the article Futtergate, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rick Block (talk) 03:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Futtergate
I've nominated Futtergate, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Futtergate satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Futtergate and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Futtergate during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Rick Block (talk) 13:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Rick,


 * I feel that as Futtergate helped to shape the planning community in the Central North Island, that it is indeed worthy of being on Wikipedia. I am unimpressed that you wish this summary to be deletted. Perhaps if you had been near the Futtergate controvery (instead of residing in America) you would have a different view. Anyways as WIkipedia is a global domain you are entitled to your views.


 * Billy

Billy, If it's as significant as you say, I'd think it wouldn't be terribly difficult to find some mention of it somewhere on the web. If you can find a reliable source, I'd be happy to work with you to develop it into an article. -- Rick Block (talk) 01:19, 11 June 2007 (UTC)