User talk:Billy Hathorn/Archive 22

Patrick McCauley
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Patrick McCauley, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://digplanet.com/wiki/Patrick_McCauley.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:02, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Reply:

This article was created on May 17, 2015; Dig Planet picked it up soon afterwards.

The article was deleted on May 29 by Black Kite as "prod expired, non-notable person". I was not notified that the article was being considered for speedy deletion. No one challenged the prod. I contacted Black Kite and asked that the article be returned to the board, as I had no knowledge that the material had been questioned. Black Kite did not reply to my inquiry.

I returned the revised article to the board on June 29; Dig Planet automatically picks up the changes made. The bot found the duplication with Dig Planet. Billy Hathorn (talk) 18:27, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Overton Brooks
Since you have done a great deal of editing to this article, I'm dropping you a heads up. I heavily edited the section on his last election. It was almost like a biography of his opponent and was referenced on a obituary. Obituaries fail WP:RS besides the article is about Brooks. McClanahan's marriage, what children he had, his running for political office after his loss to Brooks, don't belong in the Brooks article. I know you added none of this. The IP(s) who did even thought a link to an obituary on McClanahan's wife should be at the bottom of the references section.

Just explaining to you what I did and why. Cheers!...William 18:24, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of P. Elmo Futrell, Jr. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. Elmo Futrell, Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/P. Elmo Futrell, Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William 18:40, 5 July 2015 (UTC) =

=

Your contributed article, Talk:Timothy Dwight Hobart/Temp


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Talk:Timothy Dwight Hobart/Temp. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Timothy Dwight Hobart. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Timothy Dwight Hobart – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Please do not remove the copyvio template from articles, as you did with Susan Pamerleau. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept non-free text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at Talk:Susan Pamerleau/Temp. If you continue to insert copyright violations and/or remove copyright notices, you may be blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:14, 9 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I did not intentionally remove the template. I edited the article and punched "save". It came up again in the regular format. Billy Hathorn (talk) 19:11, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The template carries, in large clear black letters, this message: "Do not restore or edit the blanked content on this page until the issue is resolved by an administrator, copyright clerk or OTRS agent." Is that really so hard to understand? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=685452158 your edit] to 7-Eleven may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:24, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Susan Pamerleau. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:13, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Schreiner&
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Schreiner&, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://dictionary.sensagent.com/schreiner%20s/en-en/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:52, 15 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I changed the title of the article to Schreiner's Department Store, instead of Schreiner's, as another article was created Charles Schreiner. It's the same material but under a different, more defined, name for the article. Billy Hathorn (talk) 19:05, 15 October 2015 (UTC)