User talk:Billydakid69

August 2022
Your recent editing history at 2022 Arizona gubernatorial election shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at 2022 Arizona gubernatorial election. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:55, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

The last concern posted on the talk page was months ago without response. I will not let my concern die in the talk page. Wikipedia will be doing a disservice to voters if it only tells them about the two Democrat and Republican choices. Too many reverts against my edit, besides yours seemingly, are based in anti-minor party opinion, the reverts to my edits have not been made objectively. Billydakid69 (talk) 14:58, 8 August 2022 (UTC)


 * If you return to edit warring after this block expires, your next block will be even longer. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:05, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Unjustly Blocked by Muboshgu For Trying To Inform Voters of ALL Choices
I do not agree. The anti-minor party vandals have indeed deliberately intended to obstruct as well as defeat the project's purpose by removing the minor party candidates as the purpose is to inform readers on all candidates. Limiting reader knowledge on the choices the Arizona electorate can choose is not the way a Wikipedia article should be done. In addition, referring to edits as stupid violates WP:NPA and validating such a subjective stance is in opposition to Wikipedia's stated pursuit of objectivity. My conduct was justified and I do not apologize for reverting anti-minor party vandalism on the 2022 Arizona Gubernatorial Election article. Billydakid69 (talk) 15:41, 8 August 2022 (UTC)