User talk:Bin Khater

File:Mohammed_bin_Ali.jpg‎ listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mohammed_bin_Ali.jpg‎, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Bin Khater (talk) 01:13, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! WWGB (talk) 12:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Al-Khater
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WWGB (talk) 12:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Potential conflict of interest
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. -- The Red Pen of Doom  13:46, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

IP Vandalism and page protection
Wikipedia values the ability of "everyone to contribute" and so page protections and blocks are not distributed lightly. The first goal is to minimize the impact and so if the vandalism is coming from one particular IP, then we (as a community, not me personally because I dont have the tools) would block the IP and allow the article to remain open. If the vandalism is coming from a range of IPs directed to one article, then we would protect the article to allow other valid contributorss who may be editing from the shared IP address to continue to contribute. But before we take either action, there has to be a persistant ongoing history of Vandalism and not just edits that you dont approve of. We want to give a series of increasingly strict notices and warnings to the party that is doing the vandalism in the hopes that they will eventually stop their distruptive behavior. The editor adding the unsourced content has now recieved a couple of information notices, if the disruptive behavior continues, or if it starts to include specific libelous comments about individuals then the appropriate actions outlined above can proceed. -- The Red Pen of Doom  20:24, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Edit war warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- The Red Pen of Doom  21:00, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Be careful
You are well on your way to getting blocked. This content was removed as violating several of our policies - verifiability (you need to specifically cite your source so that readers and editors can see where you got that information) and without having a source, that content is in full violation of presenting content in a neutral point of view. Returning the content multiple times without fixing the concerns is not only violation of our content policies, but a violation of our 3 revert rule which will get you blocked even faster. I suggest you go back and revert yourself or provide specific citations to support the content. -- The Red Pen of Doom  21:09, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for reverting the article to its stub version. What would probably be a good next step is to create a workshop space on your user page (WP:UP) to start to develop the article to its fuller extent. When you have gotten the draft article to be at a reasonable point where you feel it meets our guidelines of verifiability, no original research and presented in a neutral point of view then invite a couple of editors to go over the draft and give comments / make edits. At that point you can move the upgraded draft from your user space to the actual article.
 * But also note the release and warning that appears every time you press Save Page: "Please note: If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed for profit by others, do not submit it."
 * -- The Red Pen of Doom  21:52, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- The Red Pen of Doom  01:58, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 02:06, 28 August 2009 (UTC)