User talk:Binabik80

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -Wolf530 18:03, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Roman Empire and Roman Emperor
Hi Binabik80, I responded to your proposal on splitting up Roman Emperor on Talk:Roman Empire. Cheers! --Hippalus 09:39, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)

Books
Hullo there. I saw some of your reading selection..and even that you're choosy about what you read. Was wondering if you'd read anything by Sean Russell, specifically his World Without End and its sequel, Sea Without a Shore ? I think it portrays the age of colonisation well. -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy)  05:04, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Roman Gaul image
That information about copyright does greatly help. Thanks. &rarr; Jarlaxle Artemis   05:20, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)

Talk:Fantasy
On Talk:Fantasy a while ago you made some comments regarding whether contemporaries of "Classical" and "Mediaeval" fantasy made the same distinction between reality and fiction as modern readers. I agree with your opinion on this, but I'm looking for some references that could support it better and elaborate on it. If you know of any other sources on this topic, I'd appreciate it. (My primary interest in this is not for wikipedia, but if I find anything interesting I'll surely add it) &mdash; Hoho (Talk) 13:26, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

re: google.com
It seems like it turned into a redirect already. I didn't know there was a page on google already.

Cassius
I request you revert your edit on this page, as I did discuss this with an administrator; Mark. If you look in the edit history, you would also see the assistance he gave me, which I believe shows acceptance for the work I did. To revert it all is rather deconstructive, needless, and not particularly welcomed. Especially after I changed every page that linked to the relevant Cassius to Gaius Cassius Longinus, so the redirect is totally unnecessary. --Daniel Lawrence 22:44, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

upsilon transcribed as f or v
I'm pretty sure this article should be at Euagoras; I'm not aware of any other instances of upsilon being transliterated as v. Are there any objections? Binabik80 16:49, 1 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Certainly there are many instances of upsilon being transcribed as v or f, although I think that's normally when transcribing Modern Greek rather than Classical Greek. Strictly speaking, it's transcription rather than transliteration, because the choice of which letter in the Latin alphabet is used, depends on the pronunciation. Michael Hardy 02:10, 15 July 2005 (UTC)


 * PS: I'd bet large sums of money -- maybe even 50 cents, that nearly all cases in which the letter f appears in transcriptions from Modern Greek are occurences of upsilon. The other Greek letter that gets pronounced that way is &phi;, and that's transcribed as ph. Michael Hardy 02:12, 15 July 2005 (UTC)


 * The convention in English -- which after all, Binabik80, you defended so well in Mark Antony -- is that Ευ- is transliterated as Ev- before a vowel: Evander, not Euander. (And indeed, evangelist, not euangelist.) Opoudjis 15:30, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Dera
I appreciate your comments about T.E. Lawrence and his rape at Dera. I personally feel we must trust Lawrence on this, and that it did happen. Not to mention it would be dishonest at best... Trish Lewis 20:48, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

User talk:209.167.159.66
I'm sorry, since the only things I ever changed were probably grammar mistakes and mispelled words. If you could provide me on what I have changed, it would be appreciated.

I see, thanks for telling me that. I believe someone else is using my computer/ip address to edit the article (I live in a boarding school), as I have no interest for footbal. But thanks for informing me about it.

BVM
Some titles include the definite article, some don't. For example The Guardian, The Irish Times, the Irish Independent, etc. It depends on the formal name and whether in its registered form it includes or excludes the definite article. Blessed Virgin Mary does not use the definite article has part of the title. However The Blessed Virgin uses the definite article because in Catholicism in mediæval times some individuals who were honoured for their virginity were referred to as a blessed virgin. They were distinguished from the BVM by the non use of the definite article and lowercasing of the title. In contrast the BVM was described using the definite article as part of the title and by uppercasing. Though the use of the blessed virgins reference has long since died out for the other, it has stuck with the BVM. WP has a policy of not including definite articles unless they are part of the title. In those cases the The with the capital is used, usually bolded, in the first refererence, but then used grammatically, not in forms of theoretical title, in the rest of the text. (Monarchs for example, are often described as The King in the opening paragraph, but as ' . . . the King . . . ' elsewhere in the text.)

The reason I didn't leave an edit summary simply because I couldn't. WP is screwing around tonight. On one article I had to hit save 19 times before it saved. Instead save kept merely showing previews. In that case it took 6 saves and everytime 1 failed it blanked the edit line summary. The one that I had forgotten to re-enter the edit line yet again in the version that was saved. Having spent most of my time on WP today re-re-re-re-saving things I didn't dare do a new minor edit to add in an edit summary as that would have involved spending another five-ten minutes trying to get the save to work again. I will return the article to the generally agreed form for such articles. FearÉIREANN 22:34, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Veronese Riddle
Hi Binabik, and thanks for your interest. I read the point you raised about the Indovinello. You can find my answer on the discussion page. Bye. --Wikipedius 23:03, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Actually you are wrong turning His government to his government. When reference is being made to a government of a monarch who is a nominal chief executive in a parliamentary system, it is standard English to capitalise His and Her and seen as constitutionally illiterate to lowercase it. Slán FearÉIREANN \(caint)  02:11, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Infobox President
Hi. There has been a mess on that template. As a hot fix I've created template:Infobox President old. Please use that on all articles that you see broken. Many articles have already been converted to a new parameter set, so they now need the new version of Netoholic in order not to break. Adrian Buehlmann 02:17, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Hi. Please address further concerns regarding template:Infobox President to User:Netoholic. template:Infobox President old is now orphaned (not used) and I put it up for a speedy delete. Adrian Buehlmann 10:03, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Waldorf and Nancy
Hi, and Happy New Year. I'm not going to revert your edit, but I do think that a married couple who were both born the same day is a very curious phenomenon. And when they are both noteworthy persons, this makes it even more curious. But I suppose it all depends on one's innate sense of curiousity. Well, I thought it was so curious that I posed a question the Miscellaneous Reference Desk earlier this year seeking information about any other such cases. From memory, I think we discovered 4. Highly unusual, hence highly curious. JackofOz 07:06, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Roman Senate
I have responded to an edit of yours for the Roman Senate nearly a year ago. I would like to say I love your overrated men of history, and five favorites. I feel bad for ol' Jefferson on your list, though I agree. I still kinda like the guy though. My fav is Caesar too, and I agree about Cicero and ESPECIALLY Jackson. I hate that guy. I really really agree with you on Cato. Ok, Im just going off, but I have a great suggestion of novels for you: the First Man in Rome series by Colleen McCullough. And as for Meier's bio of Caesar. Its decent, but I think his sometime psycho-analysing is kind of fruitless. I mean, how can we know any of that? Anyway, drop me a line if you like. bb.f.d.caesar@gmail.com

Military History Task Force
Hello, I see that you've made some edits on Italian history, and was wondering if you'd be able to join a new Military History WikiProject Task Force opening up on Italian military history. It will just be a small division of the main project, but it will be devoted to helping the fairly sad Italian history articles on Wikipedia right now, (for instance, all articles on their WWII tanks are stubs), as well as Roman articles, and we need a few editors before we can actually create the project. Thank you for any support.-KingPenguin 11:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, you can join at WikiProject Military history/Italian military history task force, though unfortunately for some Rome articles are now out, but I hope you're still interested. You would be the fifth member.-KingPenguin 23:53, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Change to Common.css
Per recent discussions, the way in which Persondata is viewed by Wikipedia editors has changed. In order to continue viewing Persondata in Wikipedia articles, please edit your user CSS file to display table.persondata rather than table.metadata. More specific instructions can be found on the Persondata page. -- ShakingSpirit talk  on behalf of Kaldari 00:44, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Jekyll
Diff Strictly speaking it did both, as he wore wigs when playing both Jackman and Hyde, but you're right about it not matching what the source says. Brad 09:42, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Invitation
Hello there

I see you are interested in the Life On Mars Television Series, as I am.

At the moment I have A Life On Mars Wikiproject currently up for approval by the Wikiproject Approval Council. As you are interested in Life On Mars I was wondering if you would be interested in adding your name and joining. If you are interested you can find it on WikiProject Council/Proposals its right at the very bottom you cant miss it as its titled ‘Wikipedia: Wikiproject Life on Mars (Television Series)’. And after your name is added to Wikiproject propsals please add it to the main page Wikiproject Life On Mars

If you are interested by all means feel free to join

Regards

Police,Mad,Jack —Preceding comment was added at 17:19, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

No content in Category:1294 BC deaths
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:1294 BC deaths, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:1294 BC deaths has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:1294 BC deaths, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:50, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Category:774 BC deaths
I notice that this category is unpopulated (empty). In other words, no Wikipedia pages belong to (are members of) it. If it remains unpopulated for four days, it may be deleted, without discussion, in accordance with Criteria for speedy deletion. I'm notifying you, the creator of the category, in case you wish to (re-)populate it by adding to articles/categories that belong in it.

I have also blanked the category page. This will not, in itself, cause the category to be deleted. It serves to document (in the page history) that the category was empty at the time of blanking and also to alert other watchers that the category is in jeopardy. You are welcome to revert the blanking if you wish. However, doing so will not prevent deletion if the category remains empty.

If you created the category in error, or it is no longer needed, you can speed up the deletion process by tagging it with db-author.

--Stepheng3 (talk) 20:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Same thing with Category:920s BC deaths. --Stepheng3 (talk) 20:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Antony/Antonius
I don't understand the consensus here: why on Earth would you use a weird anglicization instead of his actual name? I'm surprised to hear that scholars do the same thing. Then again, I suppose I say "Virgil" and "Cease-r" and such, so perhaps I'm in truth just as degenerate as everyone else. I might also just be twitching because, living in Japan at present, I hear my language being butchered on a daily basis and so am increasingly contemptuous of anyone who does the same thing in English. (I'm not talking about katakana English in Japanese, because that's within the pale of acceptability I suppose, but in English class it makes me kind of want to cry.) I'd put this on the talk page, but I suppose it's already been discussed enough there. --GenkiNeko (talk) 11:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Derogatory_use_of_%22Byzantine%22
Perhaps you'd like to comment there? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 16:16, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Captain's Log, Incidental
Stagyar Zil Doggo's Log - 3/27/2010.937759937749094093850974259540702897430785

The article on K-PAX, the film, is on my watchlist, and I saw your recent edit - a good catch - which lead me to your user page. Did you like the summary I wrote? I think it's fair to say that I'm ninety-five percent responsible for the extant summary as of this moment.

That's not really the point. I noticed the inclusion of The Hitchhiker's Guide on your List of Favorite Books, and it speaks highly of you. My username comes from the Guide you know, if, like me, you take the series as a whole. But I was struck by a glaring contradiction - you also have Star Trek: Deep Space Nine on your List of Favorite TV Programs... How can this be? I mean - you've got TNG on there; the original Star Wars under Favorite Movies... some seriously classy things - and then you go and dilute it with DS9(?). That's a really wild thing, man. I mean, it's a list of television programs. You had kind of a lot of options. Are you sure I can't talk you into the X-Files? Or the Venture Bros? Voyager, even. You write like a Brit, what about Blackadder? Or Monty Python?

I just can't grasp it. Stagyar Zil Doggo (talk) 19:46, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

I can get copies from Ancestry.com to verify the records on George Raft. He is listed in the New York City Birth Index under that date. I can submit them to Wikipedia. Also, the 1900 and 1910 Censuses too. They are legitimate records.Stutzey (talk) 10:57, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello
Hi Binabik,

Just pinging your talk page to say I love your username. :) Best wishes and happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester  15:59, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:14, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Magic
Hi there. I noticed you moved Magic (The Cars song) to Magic (Cars song). Are you planning to do this to all The Cars' songs? If you are, I'd strongly recommend you discuss this on Talk:The Cars first. And if you're not, you should probably revert your move so that the article titles aren't inconsistent. Thanks, 28bytes (talk) 03:05, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

A Song of Ice and Fire: Complete Character Guide to George R.R. Martin's Novel (Wiki content for your Kindle) [Kindle Edition]
hi, Is there any way to get this ebook from you. I've Seen it on Amazon, but unfortunately its not available anymore. Would Be great, if you could contact me on zipperheadtrack(at)gmail.com. Thx Regards Markus — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.135.15.233 (talk) 18:14, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Input request
Hello Binabik80,

I noticed your comment in this discussion on gender and football article names and am requesting your input for a proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/National teams. Thank you in advance for any feedback. Dkreisst (talk) 21:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Cary Grant
A few years ago you participated in a discussion at Talk:Cary Grant about his citizenship. A recent RFC has begun on Cary Grants citizenship reference in the lead paragraph. Please feel free to add a comment at Talk:Cary Grant.-- JOJ Hutton  22:41, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

thnak you
for the worlds longest expalination of an edit at Klaus Voormann‎. It also made perfect sense. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 19:37, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

GTA V: Thanks
Just wanted to thank you for your edits to Grand Theft Auto V and your usage of edit comments. Wikipedia needs more people doing things like that. --nenntmich ruhigip (Diskussion) 14:06, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heros von Borcke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anthony Starke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shake it Up (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles James Fox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Fox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joseph Joffre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Expeditionary Force. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Causes of the French Revolution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enlightenment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Alexander, Lord Stirling, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Battle of Yorktown and William Howe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:236 BC births


A tag has been placed on Category:236 BC births requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 01:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:157 BC births


A tag has been placed on Category:157 BC births requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 13:25, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:236 BC births


A tag has been placed on Category:236 BC births requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:32, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Evzones
Thanks for your edit on Evzones. For "a dog, was the name of an animal that barks" -> "a dog is an animal that barks", a useful link with more explanation is WP:REFERS in the edit summary. --Macrakis (talk) 18:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Roman Emperor (Principate) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roman Emperor (Principate) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Roman Emperor (Principate) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Avis11 (talk) 17:49, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:120 BC births


A tag has been placed on Category:120 BC births requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1458 BC deaths


A tag has been placed on Category:1458 BC deaths requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 13:35, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Miami Vice
Heya, so I noticed the tense changes you implemented on the MV article.... and I guess it makes sense. Personally - I think the path of lower resistance would have been to change all the present tenses that you found to past - because it consequently made the rest of the article read funny as it too was then inconsistent. Maybe give a heads up in the talk next time about such a concern before doing part of it.... if not actually completing it all. I spent a considerable amount of time on it to go through the rest and try to square it. There were hundreds. I no doubt missed some, and probably even screwed up others... but now I have a headache and my eyes are falling out of my head. So - either other folks will have to re-check that work and the rest of the article, or I will revisit it again later once I can see straight again. :) Picard&#39;s Facepalm (talk) 04:46, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:15 BC deaths


A tag has been placed on Category:15 BC deaths indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:547 BC deaths


A tag has been placed on Category:547 BC deaths indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:04, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:350 BC deaths


A tag has been placed on Category:350 BC deaths indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:31, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Category:Roman generals has been nominated for merging
Category:Roman generals has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:03, 3 June 2024 (UTC)