User talk:Binaryedit

Linked list
I know of the utlist package, but WP is not a depository of web urls. If you want to discuss the package (and justify such activity) in the text of the article feel free to do so if it contributes to the article and in that case you can quote it. But the page doesn't really contribute anything substantially in support of the article. I know now there are other links, which should be examined too, but I just happened to detect yours. Kbrose (talk) 20:24, 12 May 2009 (UTC) Other data structures' pages include an Implementations section with a set of links to available open source implementations. I would hardly call it a depository. In any case there should be some consistency applied to the links as you point out. Binaryedit (talk) 20:34, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I do think discussions of implementations in the text of articles is proper and can be useful, albeit it is often abused to provide some advertising. Some packages do have novel implementation aspects, that are noteworthy. Perhaps this package can be discussed in terms of its built-in analysis of most efficient hash functions for an application, which may make it notable and interesting to a general audience. Kbrose (talk) 20:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)