User talk:Binasengar

Welcome!
Hello, Binasengar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -- Toddy1 (talk) 08:48, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

=
======================= User talk:Bgwhite User talk:Toddy1

I felt that whatever changes you were suggesting were not clear, I had worked on 'Sengar' intensively and did appropriate research on whatever I wrote on. There have been some format which you might have felt ok, but not by me. The present write up on Sengar does not go as per the community history and its rather abusive. I feel sad that you are being insensitive while making changes and totally make undo of my changes.Toddy1 I thank you for your concern. I am too busy to delve into editing of Wikipedia, yet took time to work on it read all the talk contents of 'Sengar Talk', while reading felt sorry about poor understanding of history of a community which is portrayed. More to it, people who are rejecting or deleting/editing contents are least aware about the community history and making abusive comments. Wikipedia is a major source and widely studied, if such derogatory comments about a community are made in the same, then its sad. It will rather discourage people who actually want to contribute in it after doing a lot of research in the same. Personally I am historian and work in field of historical research and teach history. Moreover, those editing or deleting contents seem to be done by computer science people. If they have problems with my/or any one's content writing style then either they could have reverted it or as a volunteer could have written it in format assumed by Wiki, rather out rightly deleting it. Secondly Some Vinays978 wrote It seems more like dominating behavior of some members; where you threaten members about blocking! I dont see it as a mature persons approach. If ethics to be stated then sad, its domination which is prevailing in Wikipedia and not actual dialogue of sanity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Binasengar (talk • contribs) 11:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If you used the article talk page, you could resolve these problems.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:10, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

=
=============================================

Sengar
Anymore reverts without fixing the issues raised will result in you being blocked. See the history of the article to look at the edit summaries. The edit summaries have the issues. Also, look at how other articles are written. Your version doesn't come close to any other article. Bgwhite (talk) 06:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 day for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bgwhite (talk) 07:01, 29 August 2016 (UTC)


 * You reverted Sengar again with no reason given. You have not talked here.  You were to address the issues and not just revert.  You didn't follow the instructions I gave, so you are now blocked.  Bgwhite (talk) 07:02, 29 August 2016 (UTC)


 * left non-English message's on Sengar's talk page. It's the only edits that user has made.  Just a warning, if you use other accounts while being blocked, that is an indefinite block.   If you want to leave messages while blocked, you can leave them here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bgwhite  (talk • contribs) 08:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Binasengar, you have been editing Wikipedia on the subject of the Sengar people for two years. In that time, you have never once used the article talk page to discuss your edits. I suggest that you read Talk page guidelines. You have plenty of time, as you have been blocked until 1st September. Article talk pages are very useful, as they allow people to gain a better understanding. It is often possible to produce much better articles when our views are challenged by people with other points of view. In addition, sometimes edits are reverted because of issues of writing style or formatting - these are things, which if corrected, would allow the person make a modified version of their edit, but if not corrected may lead to revert-wars.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:48, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rishivanshi


A tag has been placed on Rishivanshi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"Original research"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Heba Aisha (talk) 01:26, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rishivanshi


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Rishivanshi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Heba Aisha (talk) 03:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)