User talk:Binayak256

Binayak256 (talk) 11:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ForeVision Digital


A tag has been placed on ForeVision Digital requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. versacespace leave a message!  17:36, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 17:57, 28 May 2021 (UTC)


 * You didn't just create a promotional article. At the same time, you promoted the same company in your other edits. You also created the article in multiple places, or at least redirects to the article, including on a non-existent user's userpage. I assume you have a conflict of interest and that you are somehow affiliated with the company. Undisclosed paid editing is prohibited on Wikipedia.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:06, 28 May 2021 (UTC)


 * I can not agree with you, because my previous edit was completely genuine, there is no paid editing at the same time I also provided valid reference for that article. Maybe it was just few for Wikipedia. but it was completely genuine. I'm new here, but I'm not a paid editor. And yes by mistakenly I was created that article as an user page & as an article too. Binayak256 (talk) 20:22, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * You provided no source for this promotional edit.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:53, 28 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Ok, I understand. I have a doubt, does IMDb is a valid source for this? If, yes then I can provide. Binayak256 (talk) 21:38, 28 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Generally, IMDb is not considered a reliable source, but I was just rebutting your statement. The fact is that you were promoting the company, and the information was not sufficiently noteworthy to include in the article, even if sourced. The truth of the matter is I don't believe that you don't have some interest in the company, and arguing about it is fruitless.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:22, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Ok, I understand! Genuinely saying I do not have any personal interest on that company, I'm completely new in here. I was unaware about wikipedia terms. I'm a learner, please teach me which is reliable source for an article. I definitely do not make this kind of mistakes again. I hope you'll understand. Just give a chance to fix my mistakes.

Binayak256 (talk) 08:56, 29 May 2021 (UTC)