User talk:Bine Mai/Archive3

welcoming
Please do not welcome users until they have contributed. Firstly it can sound patronising ('thanks for your contributions? I haven't done anything!') and secondly it can scare some users off. Ironholds (talk) 21:48, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Logo portconstanta.gif)
You've uploaded File:Logo portconstanta.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 22:30, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User Start articles
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Cadwaladr (talk) 20:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Welcomes
Hi Mario1987. As nice as it is that you're welcoming new users, it'd be better if you stop your current method. Generally, we only welcome users who have made at least one (non-vandal) edit. 90% of our new accounts never edit, so welcoming them is a waste of time, energy and bandwidth. Additionally, the red-linked talk page is very useful for people dealing with vandalism. Turning it blue slows their useful work. Thanks. ➨ ❝ ЯEDVERS ❞ a reasonably good buy 09:41, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi
Hi, I'm really not that much into footbal, but I like it. Good job! Alecsdaniel (talk) 19:12, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

re
Interesant portalul. Cum pot sa devin membru? Sfeclamare (talk) 19:53, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Portal
It looks very nice, I don't really have time to contribute to the Argentine one, my list of things to do seems to double in size every 3 months, just going through my watchlist and the New footy articles takes up most of the time I have for editing these days. Good luck with it. King of the North   East  22:02, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello Mario! Thanks for letting me know about the existence of that portal. Is there anything else to say but "great to have that, good job, keep up the good work?" --Vlad|-> 10:28, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but no thanks!... Lately I don't have anymore the time I used to have for wiki... so I'm just browsing around and fixing stuff where I see it to be broken. Moreover, I never could edit something in a particular category (i.e. I'm a football enthusiast, a fan sometimes, I love football, but I don't think I've got the patience to edit about it... :) But good luck in recruiting more members. If you don't have an account yet, I recommend you to come over to the Romanian wikipedia, I think that there are some football fans there too!... --Vlad|-> 10:47, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Excellent job, it could be compared with other football portals that are probably bigger. However, I won't contribute to that portal (or some kind of a Romanian football project, if it would exist). It's not only because I have too much work right now, but I also believe I am still being misunderstood after I did all that job on Romanian Cup 2008–09. I'm not that interested in Romanian football in general but I'm writing/editing/contributing to this season's European football articles and therefore Romanian Cup article was just part of that work, nothing more. Anyway, great job with the portal and I hope you will have enough editors to support it. Bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 11:18, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Cu pla! :) --Vlad|-> 12:52, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Port of Thessaloniki
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.

DYK
I would like to help in reviewing the WP:DYK, suggestions section. How can i do that? Do i have to have a special status for ex. to be a member of WP:DYK? Thanks in advance. Mario 1987  20:32, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi, there is no special requirements to start checking the DYKs. All you need to do is know the rules. You can read them on the DYK page. You need to check that the article is either new, or 5x expanded the last five days (first edit on the day it is listed), that the hook is referenced (including reading the reference if it is online) and is in the article, and that the hook is no more than 200 characters. I think it should re fairly well documented on the DYK page. A tip can be to install the java script  on your monobook page (add the above code to User:Mario1987/monobook.js). This allows you a one-click check of the readable prose length (the part that is qualifiable for DYK). I've seen some of your work around, and I find it quite interesting (of course, it is in a field I enjoy reading about too). Good luck, and please ask if there is anything you wonder about. Arsenikk  (talk)  20:58, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.

Re: My DYK on Wisconsin Highway 131
I replied to your comment about my DYK for Wisconsin Highway 131. I did have a non-Google source for the hook, it was just later in the sentence. --TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 02:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK suggestion - Harlington Wood Jr.
This was posted in the 16 Jan update, and is set to expire soon. I think all the sources are solid and while I prefer the second hook, you folk can use whichever one you wish. I just didn't want it to be missed. Could you take a gander and help out? - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  18:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Ulan Bator
hi there,

do you mean with 5x an article has to be expanded five times the size by me (or someone else) in order to be nominated? Seems a tall order if that would be the case. Gryffindor (talk) 20:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok. I thought I have expanded the article 5 times? Or if there is something missing, what else do I have to do? Gryffindor (talk) 13:15, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh wow, that's crazy. I find that rule rather strange in that case, but thanks for explaining it to me. I guess I'll take the nomination out then. pity. Gryffindor (talk) 14:15, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Farcasanu 3.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Farcasanu 3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:12, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

No content in Category:Portal:Romanian football
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Portal:Romanian football, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Portal:Romanian football has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Portal:Romanian football, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:40, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Faidherbestamp.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Faidherbestamp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Arsenikk (talk)  16:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Template talk:Did you know
Hi, Mario. Please be aware of my complaint at User talk:BorgQueen. Xn4 ( talk ) 03:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I have a prose counting tool and in the first instance it sais 1,320 charachers and in the second instance 6,105 characters so it's only a 4.6x expansion. Sorry Mario  1987  09:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The only way I can get the first total to 1,320 is by including the "external links" and spaces, which I find unreasonable. May I ask what you were counting? Xn4  ( talk ) 10:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Harta potentialului eolian.jpg
Where on the website is it stated that it is released under a CC license? &mdash; neuro  (talk)  16:37, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, you need OTRS confirmation of that, or it will be deleted for lack of proof of permission. I won't tag as an NPD for now, but I will soon if no evidence is provided via OTRS. Thanks, &mdash; neuro  (talk)  19:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Did You Know question
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible. Art LaPella (talk) 06:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.

Portal:Romanian football
I like it :P 89.33.128.101 (talk) 19:50, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

List of wind farm projects in Romania
The first sentence should read 7 gigawatts, not megawatts, I think. Perhaps this was a typo inherited from here? (think dude, Romania's smallest windfarm, out of dozens, is bigger than 7 megawatts)-TungstenCarbide (talk) 16:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Category:Oil and gas companies of Paraguay
For every category you create, you should specify parent categories to which it belongs.

Contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards,--Stepheng3 (talk) 20:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Margau Mǎrgǎu
Merci! Basketball110  My story/Tell me yours 15:49, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm fine. I've been sick, though.  And you?   Basketball110  My story/Tell me yours 21:17, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Constanţa Shipyard
--Dravecky (talk) 07:48, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Apartment building 63
Shubinator (talk) 01:53, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK problem
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.

Aleea Clasicilor
Mulţumesc pentru traducere! :) --Gikü (talk) 08:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Motru Coal Mine
I'm confused by the mention of Rovinari without a link to the article Rovinari, but I'm not sure there should be a link...is this mine in Motru or Rovinari? Perhaps the mention of Rovinari should just be deleted, but I don't know the subject.

Also, in National Company of Lignite Oltenia, should the section on 'Motru Coal Field' link to this new stub?

Cheers,

--  Chzz  ►  10:27, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Harta-solara-romania.jpg}
Thank you for uploading File:Harta-solara-romania.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:42, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Harta-solara-romania.jpg}
Thank you for uploading File:Harta-solara-romania.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:42, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Harta-solara-romania.jpg}
Thank you for uploading File:Harta-solara-romania.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:42, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians interested in Halo (series)
For every category you create, you should specify parent categories to which it belongs.

Contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 19:25, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Likewise with Category:Culture in Chişinău. --Stepheng3 (talk) 19:31, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Likewise with Category:Wikipedians who attend the Vasile Goldiş West University of Arad. --Stepheng3 (talk) 19:51, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Likewise with Category:Users that play the Cruce card game. --Stepheng3 (talk) 19:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Category:Monuments in Chişinău
I notice that this category you created is unpopulated (empty). In other words, no Wikipedia pages belong to it. If it remains unpopulated for four days, it may be deleted, without discussion, in accordance with Criteria for speedy deletion. I'm notifying you in case you wish to (re-)populate it by adding to articles/categories that belong in it.

I blanked the category page. This will not, in itself, cause the category to be deleted. It serves to document (in the page history) that the category was empty at the time of blanking and also to alert other watchers that the category is in jeopardy. You are welcome to revert the blanking if you wish. However, doing so will not prevent deletion if the category remains empty.

If you created the category in error, or it is no longer needed, you can speed up the deletion process by tagging it with db-author.

Contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 19:28, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

UCfD nomination of Category:Wikipedians who watch The Money Channel
Category:Wikipedians who watch The Money Channel, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the Categories for discussion page. --Stepheng3 (talk) 19:46, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Petrobrazi Refinery
Shubinator (talk) 20:49, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Hydroelectric Power Plant
I moved two articles that you started into another name. One of them is (Cakovec Hydro Power Plant into Čakovec Hydroelectric Power Plant), and the other is Zakučac. I hope you agree. I didnt move others because they didnt have (č,ć,š...) in the article name. But if you want you can move them, so that all Hidro becames Hydroelectric. Regards. --Kebeta (talk) 21:21, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Solar power in Romania
 Royal broil  02:14, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Dacia Duster
--Dravecky (talk) 21:19, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Football in Romania
Am scos acum vreo saptamana templateul Football in Romania de pe pagina cluburilor (pentru ca nu merita sa fie prezenta pe pagina cluburilor, acolo nu avem decat linkuri catre competitii - nici macar cele in desfasurare), iar Vlad9 le-a dat undo. Am intrebat pe Wikipedia_talk:WPF si cei de acolo au fost de acord ca acel portarl nu are ce cauta pe pagina cluburilor. Tu ce parere ai ? LaUr3nTiU (talk) 15:56, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Happy 's Day!
For a userbox you can put on your userpage, please see User:Dylan620/Today/Happy Me Day!. For helpful contributions in the areas of Romania, energy, and other areas, here you go! :D &rarr; Dyl @  n  620  02:06, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ramazan Abbasov
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ramazan Abbasov, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Has been unsourced for 3 months, fails the sourcing requirement at WP:BLP

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Kevin (talk) 11:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:DMHI.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:DMHI.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 00:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Request for tagging WP:Energy categories
Hi, Mario. As a participant of the WP:Energy, I would like to ask you to comment the request for tagging WP:Energy articles by bot. The list of potential categories for tagging is located here and the discussion about which categories should be excluded from this list, is going on at the WP:Energy talkpage here. Your comments are welcome. Beagel (talk) 12:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Oncescu-kbile5-thumb-250-0-18.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Oncescu-kbile5-thumb-250-0-18.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:20, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Oncescu-kbile5-thumb-250-0-18.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Oncescu-kbile5-thumb-250-0-18.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:35, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Supercamionul-3.jpg
Salut,

Dacă într-adevăr ai făcut tu poza aceasta, ai putea să o muţi pe commons:, ca să poată fi folosită şi la ro.wp? Mersi!--Strainu (talk) 17:36, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Insomnia Summer Show
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.

List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_country
What are you doing to this list. Out of your dozens edits, I have found a few which are correct (i.e., they follow the information on this site ).

Most of you changes, however, appear absolutely arbitrary. Sometime you delete a middle name, sometimes you add it. Sometimes you expand an initial to the full name, in other cases you delete the initial.

Please stop editing and have this clarified first. T om ea s y T C 09:09, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

DYK
--Soman (talk) 20:20, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi Mario, I do appreciate your work for DYK and have nothing against you personally. I look through many DYK noms and if I find something clear (+ or -), I reply, if not, I leave it to others. Thats why I wrote on your noms - they are lacking proper references, thats all, nothing serious or special. I don't speak Romanian, but I can read several european languages (both east and west), which make it easier for me to read some Romanian too. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 11:21, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * IMO, the notability of Satu Maru topics is on the edge - the mayor is notable. Colleges themselves are probably notable enough to have a WP article per each, but, the DYK hook merely listing their names is by no means notable. Materialscientist (talk) 12:31, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Mario, I do sympathize your efforts to let the world know more about Romania. I just feel you need to choose things which would be more interesting to outsiders to read (I mean for DYK, for WP articles being "interesting" is not so important), and which would be easier to support by independent references. I often get into such situation myself and try to find topics which are covered in English-speaking literature. Right now I have several cool facts, which I can't publish because of that (no reliable refs.). Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 12:40, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Pyrrhotite
It meets all the requirements. It is not a stub by any standard. By "assessment" you mean the project tag on the talk page? That is totally irrelevant. --BorgQueen (talk) 12:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * As I said, that is totally irrelevant. --BorgQueen (talk) 12:39, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * No. What makes you think it is necessary? The Geology wikiproject does not have anything to do with the DYK. --BorgQueen (talk) 12:42, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Play & Win (band)
A tag has been placed on Play & Win (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jonathan Hall (talk) 12:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Play & Win (band)
OK, they look reasonably notable to me. I'm probably getting a bit trigger-happy as a result of all these Myspace bands who seem to think it's their right to have a Wikipedia article. I'll remove the tag, sorry to bother you with this mistake. Jonathan Hall (talk) 13:56, 29 July 2009 (UTC)