User talk:Bine Mai/Archive8

mines
how do you know so much about them Swibe (talk) 03:16, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Koridor coal mine


A tag has been placed on Koridor coal mine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 18:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Aktashskoye mine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Mercury


 * Itomuka mine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Mercury


 * Terligkhaiskoye mine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Mercury

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abdoul Yoda


The article Abdoul Yoda has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:48, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Japanese mines
Thanks for creating some articles on Japanese mines. However, a number of them had inaccuracies which I have tried to correct. I also put a disputed tag on two that are so problematic I am not sure what to do with them: Sado mine and Ashio mine. Could you go over these again and especially add other sources to verify the information? Michitaro (talk) 11:04, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Sado, Niigata and Ashio Copper Mine. Don't create articles based on a single reference, especially don't use a single russian reference for japanese mines. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 05:29, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Ashio mine


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Ashio mine. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Ashio Copper Mine. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Ashio Copper Mine – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Michitaro (talk) 13:27, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Aciliu Viaduct
Hello! Your submission of Aciliu Viaduct at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 18:36, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Following a copy edit by another editor, the article is now too short, and requires more work to meet the DYK standards.  Harrias  talk 15:14, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Cordemais Power Station
 Harrias  talk 08:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Aciliu Viaduct
The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henrique de Jesus Bernardo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Jean-Pierre Adams
Allen3 talk 17:42, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Navibulgar
Is Navibulgar the same as Navigation Maritime Bulgare? Mjroots (talk) 19:44, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes it's the same company. Why do you ask? Bine  Mai  22:27, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elnur Abdullayev


The article Elnur Abdullayev has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:44, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Ilyas Gurbanov for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ilyas Gurbanov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ilyas Gurbanov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. C679 14:08, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Sahil Kerimov for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sahil Kerimov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sahil Kerimov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. C679 14:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Euromall Piteşti


The article Euromall Piteşti has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * NN 215,278 sq ft mall.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 04:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alba Mall


The article Alba Mall has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * NN 144,236 sq ft mall.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 04:57, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ricardo Porcinio Prata Junior


The article Ricardo Porcinio Prata Junior has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:53, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Romanian websites by number of unique visitors


The article List of Romanian websites by number of unique visitors has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I think this article is limited and outdated. Since 2009, 5 years passed so I'm sure statistics are changed

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yacatisma (talk) 06:39, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fábio Camillo de Brito


The article Fábio Camillo de Brito has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article has no references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AlanS (talk) 14:40, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Chomutov Wind Farm for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chomutov Wind Farm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chomutov Wind Farm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. C679 07:37, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Aviat diamond mine for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aviat diamond mine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aviat diamond mine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 01:10, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Star diamond mine


The article Star diamond mine has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Mine does not exist. Single source listed does not support claims.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Turgan Talk 20:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Orion South diamond mine


The article Orion South diamond mine has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Mine does not exist. Single source listed does not support claims.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Turgan Talk 20:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Leadbetter diamond mine


The article Leadbetter diamond mine has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Mine does not exist. Single source listed does not support claims.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Turgan Talk 20:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Renard diamond mine


The article Renard diamond mine has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Mine does not exist. Sources listed do not support claims.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Turgan Talk 20:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC) Enough Information has been found to verify this article. Turgan Talk 17:03, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Qilalugaq diamond mine


The article Qilalugaq diamond mine has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Mine does not exist. Single source listed does not support claims.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Turgan Talk 20:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Concern
I am concerned that you appear to have been duped into creating articles on mines that don't exist, or don't have the mass of minerals claimed. It seems to be that somebody has created a scam about mining investments, and some gotten press in the Indian media and even international press, but the sources are not verifiable. I presume that you disseminated the formation in good faith. Bearian (talk) 16:08, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Nonglom mine for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nonglom mine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nonglom mine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. kelapstick(bainuu) 17:04, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aleksandre Intskirveli


The article Aleksandre Intskirveli has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:32, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Foam Lake mine


The article Foam Lake mine has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not a mine. Exploration property

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Turgan Talk 20:42, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Valencia mine


The article Valencia mine has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not a mine. Exploration property

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Turgan Talk 20:42, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tubas-Tumas mine


The article Tubas-Tumas mine has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not a mine. Exploration property

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Turgan Talk 20:02, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zhonghe mine


The article Zhonghe mine has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not a mine. Exploration property

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Turgan Talk 20:02, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Romanians were nomads?
Hi. What do you think about the inclusion of the article Origin of the Romanians into Category:Nomadic_groups_in_Eurasia? If you are against, please submit a comment at Talk:Origin_of_the_Romanians 84.197.146.185 (talk) 06:48, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Barun-Shiveinsky mine


The article Barun-Shiveinsky mine has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Besides the location not being in Mongolia at all, the cited source says "The deposit is small, mined out", so I don't see how this can be a useful article. The author seems to have created a lot of articles by copying and pasting a template text, without actually checking most of the details at the time. (I've already fixed about a dozen articles falsely claiming "largest reserves in Asia and the world" for mongolian mines).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Latebird (talk) 14:38, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Asif Abbasov


The article Asif Abbasov has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Player fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played in a fully professional league, nor senior international football. No indication of any other achievements that have garnered sufficient, significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 14:35, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Samir Abdulov


The article Samir Abdulov has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Player fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played in a fully professional league, nor senior international football. No indication of any other achievements that have garnered sufficient, significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 14:45, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Emin Amiraslanov


The article Emin Amiraslanov has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Player fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played in a fully professional league, nor senior international football. No indication of any other achievements that have garnered sufficient, significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 14:52, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Javad Mirzaev for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Javad Mirzaev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Javad Mirzaev & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fenix down (talk) 15:19, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Orkhan Mirzaev for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Orkhan Mirzaev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Orkhan Mirzaev until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fenix down (talk) 15:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Asif Abbasov for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asif Abbasov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Asif Abbasov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fenix down (talk) 15:24, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Samir Abdulov for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samir Abdulov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Samir Abdulov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fenix down (talk) 15:25, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Emin Amiraslanov for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emin Amiraslanov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Emin Amiraslanov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fenix down (talk) 15:28, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Dear sir Kindly inform that the following. we are specializing for electrical and solar energy located in Arab Egypt and We are looking to partner with a company like you to manufacture solar panel and pv here in Egypt and middle east to covering the Egypt and middle east. If you have interest please us to explain more on 00201004602668 email mohamed.abdelatty@scc-eg.com skype mohamed.abdelatty7 W B R — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.133.255.215 (talk) 13:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Blake Burdette


The article Blake Burdette has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 22:03, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pelican South gas field


The article Pelican South gas field has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article is about a prospective gas field, not one that is operational, no indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:43, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Foam Lake mine for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Foam Lake mine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Foam Lake mine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:51, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Valja Strzh mine for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Valja Strzh mine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Valja Strzh mine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:21, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rio Tuba mine


The article Rio Tuba mine has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I shouldn't have to explain why Slideshare is not a source suitable enough to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:22, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Koridor coal mine


The article Koridor coal mine has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no indication of notability, almost every article that this user creates says it is "one of the largest X reserves in X" so I don't trust that claim.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:25, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Removal of Autopatrolled flag
Bine Mai, I have removed your autopatrolled user right. Looking back at your most recent creations, it seems to me that you do not understand (or you refuse to follow) the notability guidelines or sourcing requirements for articles on Wikipedia. I find this surprising, given your long tenure and extensive contributions to the project, and please believe that I am not taking this action lightly. In 2014 you went on a spree creating articles about gas fields, most if not all of these articles are based on a single source, either the company website, or a government listing of resources. You should know that this is not enough to base an article on. In 2013 you did the same thing with mining and exploration properties, often describing them as "one of the largest mines in X country", often when all that had been completed was surface drilling, and the property was not even a mine yet. In one occasion you referred to a "mine" as being in Alaska, when it is Yukon, that isn't even in the same country, and it was only an exploration project. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. --kelapstick(bainuu) 14:53, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Amangel'dy gas field


The article Amangel'dy gas field has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no indication of notability, not one statement in this article is substantiated by the questionable source provided.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. kelapstick(bainuu) 15:23, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Iskinskoe mine for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iskinskoe mine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Iskinskoe mine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. kelapstick(bainuu) 15:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello
I have seen you improved seasons or parts of articles in Cupa României and List of Cupa României finals. Would you like to help to improve other missing seasons? I already start with the first ones. Thank you!Alexiulian25 (talk) 02:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Good news on Natural gas proven
I see you that Russian gas reaches 49 trillion cubic metre from U.S. EIA survey. In the next session, would you like to improve other missing moments? I already started with a good feature. Thank You!!Nashon NK51 (talk) 09:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Romstal for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Romstal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Romstal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LaMona (talk) 16:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Overlinking
Hi, if you're writing more export articles, please take note of my unlinkings to the one on Romania. Tony  (talk)  06:28, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Dean Fausett
Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 18:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Re:Hello!
Dear User:Bine Mai, it's a pleasure that I was able to make you happy by granting you The Writer's Barnstar. I hope you'll be inspired to make more great edits! All the best, AnupamTalk 04:49, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of List of exports of Romania
Hello! Your submission of List of exports of Romania at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Random86 (talk) 02:10, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK for List of exports of Romania
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)