User talk:Binggo666

Welcome!
Hello, Binggo666, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Aurangzeb, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 10:40, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

creating a Template page
welcome, I created for you this page Template:Campaigns of Ahmad Shah Durrani --Haytham Morsy (talk) 23:41, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Mughal Flag
Could you please stop uploading fictitious flags of the Mughal Empire on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to wikipedia articles? If you wish to discuss the issue you can do so at Talk:Flag of the Mughal Empire. Abecedare (talk) 16:48, 30 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Ditto for unsourced Flag of Mysore etc. Abecedare (talk) 16:51, 30 May 2015 (UTC)


 * It appears that the flags you are uploading:
 * File:Flag of Mysore 1761-1799.jpg
 * File:Flag_of_the_Mughal_Empire_(Sher-u-Khurshid).jpg
 * are taken from this web-forum of user-created fictional flags for a Total War video game. This is not only a a copyright violation but also completely unencyclopedic. Abecedare (talk) 17:26, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Babur, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Alex2006 (talk) 14:11, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Mughal Empire. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Abecedare (talk) 22:31, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Sockpuppet investigation
Abecedare (talk) 22:57, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Ghaznavid flag
We're going to need a cite for the flag lest ancient flame wars rebirth themselves on the Ghaznavid article, and anyway that's wiki practice. Thanks.Ogress smash! 23:07, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Also we're going to need a cite for the flag on Timur as well... Ogress smash! 08:59, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Ghaznavids. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Take it to talk or stop. Ogress smash! 09:59, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

calm down i was finding a good source 182.182.49.152 (talk) 10:07, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Listen, sweetie, you don't revert until you have the (reliably-sourced) cite. You're doing these shenanigans on multiple pages: stop. Ogress smash! 13:25, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * It's super sweet you found a manuscript, but that's a primary source and you are doing OR. Ogress smash! 04:03, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Babur without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kautilya3 (talk) 13:06, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Ali Barid Shah I
Hello, Binggo666,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ali Barid Shah I should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Ali Barid Shah I.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, mikeman67 (talk) 21:30, 4 June 2015 (UTC)