User talk:Binvox

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Number one bullsh1tter (talk) 17:44, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Where?Binvox (talk) 17:44, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Right there. Number one bullsh1tter (talk) 17:47, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I asked you to point me where I did the vandalism while I reverted vandalism from Maria Kanellis still you're accusing me and providing a false diff?Binvox (talk) 17:49, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Brett Leve


A tag has been placed on Brett Leve, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Katieh5584 (talk) 19:27, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Edgar Speed
Hello Binvox. I am just letting you know that I deleted Edgar Speed, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 13:16, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Tejpal Tanwar
Hi sir i have edit the page he is real person please check references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tejpaltanwar (talk • contribs) 18:55, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Michael Cunha
Hi Binvox. I support your request for speedy deletion of John Michael Cunha. The content of the page appears to have been copied from http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/judges/sjud/rmlodha.htm which is the bio of R.M. Lodha. The bio of John Michael Cunha can be found here: http://www.firstpost.com/india/jayalalithaa-verdict-justice-john-dcunha-nonsense-judge-1732877.html. Thank you. R0x5r (talk) 23:34, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Brett Leve, Ryan Begelman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articles Brett Leve and Ryan Begelman are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The articles will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brett Leve until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. UW Dawgs (talk) 02:41, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Roolt


The article Roolt has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability, no third-party coverage in reliable sources, nothing helpful found via Google.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 02:00, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rooltlogo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Rooltlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ron h jones (Talk) 01:13, 2 December 2014 (UTC)