User talk:Biobelle5/sandbox

Kyra Dvorak Peer Review
This article was well written in the tone of an encyclopedia. There did not appear to be any bias or attempt of swaying readers toward a certain opinion, which is good. In addition, the lead in section is well written and highlights the most important parts of the article. However, I would advise, if possible, to add a section about early life or background in order to provide a more holistic view. If this were to be done, I would also advise that the lead in section be edited to include a small mention of background info in order to make sure that each of the article sections are set up by the lead section. Also, I would advise that you make separate research and career sections, or that you organize that section in smaller paragraphs, so as to aid in ease of reading and organization. Aside from these suggestions, the article does not appear to have any spelling or grammar mistakes and is organized/ flows in a very logical manner.