User talk:Biochemistsco

License tagging for Image:GHLLondon1955.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:GHLLondon1955.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 23:07, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GHLLondon1955b.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:GHLLondon1955b.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

I have the rights to this image and freely transfer them to Wikipedia. Kind regards

May 2018
Hello, I'm Everymorning. I noticed that you recently removed content from Robert Nataf without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Every morning  (there's a halo...)  22:02, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you want to communicate with me, you can just post on my talk page, as you have already done. I still think my reverting of your change to the article on Nataf was appropriate because it removed well-sourced content and added some unsourced content. That said there may be some stuff in your edits that could be added if a reliable source can be included to verify it. Every morning   (there's a halo...)  00:20, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with...

This query was entered https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk This biography of a living person relies too much on references to primary sources. (September 2018) Please advise on how to reduce this reliance. I am looking at the webpage on wiki (that I did not initiate) in my name but can add citations to published works/patents if this would help

With the response from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RudolfRed You should not edit the article yourself. Instead, put your suggested edits, including the sources in a discussion on the talk page and tag it with Edit request. Then, other editors can evaluate it and make the edits if appropriate. RudolfRed (talk) 20:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

But without guidance on what is necessary to address 'relies too much on references to primary sources.' The comment from RudolfRed addresses COI, but not 'reliance on primary sources', whatever that is. Guidance requested.

Biochemistsco (talk) 22:31, 3 March 2019 (UTC)


 * See WP:PRIMARY on what constitutes primary as opposed to secondary sources. Wikipedia content should be based on reliable secondary sources such as articles written by newspapers or reputable magazines. Patents that you hold would be primary sources; a magazine reporting on those patents would be a secondary source. The article about you is heavily based on your own work and on what you say, not on what others have reported about you. Worse, some of those primary sources don't confirm the content they're cited for. Huon (talk) 00:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

I note 'You should not edit the article yourself. Instead, put your suggested edits, including the sources in a discussion on the talk page and tag it'

Herewith suggested edits.

General link https://www.ed.ac.uk/pathway-medicine/our-staff/associate-members/professor-richard-lathe

Citation for rabies vaccine https://patents.google.com/patent/EP0162757B1/en Citations for antitumor vaccination https://www.nature.com/articles/326878a0 https://europepmc.org/abstract/med/2251291

I would add another section on Alzheimer disease Lathe has argued that infection may play a role in Alzheimer disease, and has worked with Rudy Tanzi and Rob Moir at Harvard to develop the Antimicrobial Protection Theory of Alzheimer Disease https://www.alzheimersanddementia.com/article/S1552-5260(18)33228-X/fulltext Building on earlier recommendations of an expert group https://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-alzheimers-disease/jad160152 and increasing evidence that there is a causal link between infection and Alzheimer https://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-alzheimers-disease/jad180266 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biochemistsco (talk • contribs) 00:46, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

This edit is on the talk page of the relevant article. Please clarify if these edit requests should be made elsewhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biochemistsco (talk • contribs) 23:58, 17 March 2019 (UTC)