User talk:Biocreation

Welcome!

Hello, Biocreation, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! VViking Talk Edits 02:45, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

RE: Eukaryotes
Hello, Biocreation -

I noticed how you tried to change the page eukaryote. I thought I would offer a word of advice.

Whatever your (or my) personal views, it seems to me that changing the dates in one instance, on one page, is not going to make any difference.

There certainly is a strong bias, against your (apparent) view, throughout Wikipedia; however, we can’t blame Wikipedia itself; evolution is the current view of the media and the scientific establishment at large, and temporarily editing Wikipedia pages won’t really help.

Besides, changing the dates in one place will only create confusion. Maybe you would find it a more useful occupation to attempt to remove the real unscientific bias (of which there is a great deal); this ought not to be impossible due to Wikipedia’s (self-declared) impartial policy. The encyclopædia is intended to be semi-immortal, so advocating transient theories should not be a priority. At any rate, alternative views ought not to be prohibited.

Regards, De la Marck (talk) 07:28, 1 June 2015 (UTC)