User talk:Bioelectromecha

Speedy deletion nomination of Solocam
Hello Bioelectromecha,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Solocam for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 11:01, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The page is about a notable successful new invention. If you flagged it due to promotional language or something specific I would love to know what in order to remove or edit it. Bioelectromecha (talk) 11:27, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * One article on it is not enough to make it notable.TheLongTone (talk) 11:35, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * So it requires more sources and references? Bioelectromecha (talk) 11:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Some sources and references.Deb (talk) 11:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * So a long list of independent sources and references will be enough to bring it back to life? Bioelectromecha (talk) 11:56, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 11:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC) Also, please read Conflict of interest. Deb (talk) 11:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately you didn't address the point raised on the talk page before deletion Bioelectromecha (talk) 11:50, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * When you contest deletion, it's best to address the reason given showing an understanding of the wikipedia guidelines. I recommend you read these, including Notability, Verifiability, Neutral point of view and Conflict of interest. Deb (talk) 14:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)