User talk:Biomax20

Your draft
I moved your draft to Draft:RADA Special Deterrence Forces. If you want to skip the AFC process, feel free to move it again (with my apologies). If you do, please remove the AFC template from the bottom of the article. Thanks! Rebb ing  23:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Libya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berber. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: RADA Special Deterrence Forces has been accepted
 RADA Special Deterrence Forces, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 18:32, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=RADA_Special_Deterrence_Forces help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Disambiguation link notification for February 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tripoli Cathedral, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epiphany ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Tripoli_Cathedral check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Tripoli_Cathedral?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:24, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm Boud. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Libya Observer, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Boud (talk) 13:56, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Libya Observer, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. of your personal essay. Boud (talk) 22:44, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Wet market, you may be blocked from editing. — MarkH21talk 05:08, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

@MarkH21 I am contesting your claim about "disrupting editing." There was no distuptive editing. Obvious information was added. Biomax20 (talk) 06:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * All content must be verifiable through reliable sources per Wikipedia’s policy on verifiability, and the burden is on the editor adding information to provide references. That’s what all three warnings on your talk page are about.Also please use ping to notify editors, as using the @ symbol does not do anything. — MarkH21talk 07:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tripoli Cathedral, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epiphany ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Tripoli_Cathedral check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Tripoli_Cathedral?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Tripoli Airport.Understand that verifiability is an English Wikipedia policy. You cannot continue to add unreferenced content, even if you think it is correct. Add your corrections with references to reliable sources. — MarkH21talk 07:52, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

@MarkH21 Can you please stop harassing me with your nonsense? I will complain. Biomax20 (talk) 16:46, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fathi Bashagha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GNA ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Fathi_Bashagha check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Fathi_Bashagha?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanction Notification
Please stop the pov/pointy edits.

 Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 23:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

You have no right to dictate who or what discusses what in public forums. Whatever warning this is, is noted, and ignored.

"please stop with the pov/pointy edits" Excuse me? What about the other 300 like minded pointy pov editors allowed to share their POV eh? How about NO. i will not. Get off my page or ill report you. Biomax20 (talk) 00:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

ANI notification
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 00:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Lega threats
Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 02:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

@Canterbury Tail I specifically stated "i may involve the IC3 Internet crimes complaint center, and may send a report to the British government and any relevant authority regarding the website.", Not the user "Boud". I asked him and challenged him specifically to provide a Chamber of Commerce registry number, which is a publicly accessible to prove the validity of his article, which states that the website operates from within Tripoli, Libya. If you look at the edits, you can see that we had a edit battle. His claim is that the website operates from within Libya because "it states so on the website". The legal action may or may not be taken against the website. Not the wikipedia user. Thanks. I still stand by my request and challenge that he provides a chamber of commerce number or evidence that this news site is a legitimate registered company, or news source in Libya. Thanks. Biomax20 (talk) 07:03, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

If he cannot provide that information, i informed him that i will seek whoever i can to have this article ammended or removed. And i still stand by my statement. Biomax20 (talk) 07:04, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You said on ANI you don't intend to take legal action against Wikipedia [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=999850671] "i did inform Boud that i would be taking some action ( And not against him or wikipedia )". But you say here you do intend to take legal action against Wikipedia, by reporting it to the IC3. The fact this may not directly affect the editor involved is fairly moot since you specific said "or wikipedia". No wonder people are confused. Nil Einne (talk) 08:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Civility
Here is a warning, a single warning. You need to start dealing with other editors in a more civil manner and calm down on the threats, rhetoric and general incivility. If you continue to edit Wikipedia and make comments along the lines that you are currently doing, you will be blocked from editing. Canterbury Tail talk 02:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

I will not retract from what i said in literal form, and stated: A: I challenged him to provide a Chamber of commerce number to back up his claims, which resulted in edit war, ( You can see for yourself that hes very adamant in citing information from the website, that the website operates from within Libya, which i and many others believe is false ).

B: I stated that i may or may not involve any relevant authority regarding the website, this does not involve Boud, or wikipedia, and dont intend to involve him or wikipedia in any reports anyway.

C: I believe i was pretty civil, considering the circumstances, since the website is involved in war propaganda and has caused political damage, and Boud ( in my honest legitimate belief ) is edit warring and reverting edits on the Article he made on Wikipedia, and the fact that i requested him to provide evidence for the legitimacy for the website in question and the fact that im prepared to take it up with any relevant wikipedia administrator to have the page ammended, or removed.

Instead of involving other editors or Administrators in this matter, perhaps Boud could concentrate his efforts on providing the chamber of commerce number for Libya observer and state it on the article to back up his cited source, and reinforce his claim, since i raised a issue stating that the website or company in question may, or may not be fraudulent. Thanks.

Biomax20 (talk) 07:11, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action and for not being here to build an encyclopedia. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The Bushranger One ping only 09:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You keep saying you don't intend to bring action against Wikipedia et.al. but then you keep making vague statements about taking action. Even if you truly mean you only intend to take legal action against some third party website, these comments still have a chilling effect on Wikipedia editing and at this point that is either deliberate or indistinguishable from deliberate. And regardless of these legal claims it's become very obvious you are here to right great wrongs instead of building an encyclopedia. - The Bushranger One ping only 09:29, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The following may be of interest to you: WP:SOCK, WP:BE, WP:RGW, WP:VNT. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)