User talk:Bionoetics

May 2021
Hello, I'm Smirkybec. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Science Foundation Ireland, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Smirkybec (talk) 20:46, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Smirkybec. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Irish Music Rights Organisation seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Smirkybec (talk) 20:48, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Dublin City University, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''We welcome new editors, and need the hands - but your additions to the article were poorly written, inappropriately sited, and, most seriously, cast aspersions on (living) people. Please discuss on the Talk page before re-approaching such material.'' SeoR (talk) 20:21, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Dublin City University, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. ''Further to the above warning, you also synthesised potential conclusions, and / or posed rhetorical questions (which is not appropriate in a tertiary source such as an encyclopedia), potentially impugning whole organisations (re the university's accreditation, respect for court rulings, etc.). Please don't.'' SeoR (talk) 20:24, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Bionoetics. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 21:04, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
SeoR (talk) 19:14, 26 May 2021 (UTC)