User talk:Biophase

Thanks Chaser, I know there was someone from at least one of the articles I edited who allegedly were using sockpuppets. I have a feeling some over zealous admin included me as one of these. I say allegedly because after this I can no longer consider that accusation to be a reliable one. -Biophase 17:11, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm really getting impatient now at rogue admins who block users without stating a reason and then run away. Wikipedia is crap. -Biophase 13:36, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * If you want to enable an email address, I can email you when I hear back. In the meantime, Mackensen seems to have gone on vacation, so I'm going to pursue other sources of information.--Chaser - T 15:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok -Biophase 19:20, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It is going to take some time. Please bear with us.--Chaser - T 17:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It seems like this can not be resolved and there is no reference to it. Clearly this is not an arbcom decision, I want to be unblocked, now! -Biophase 18:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Appealing an illegitimate block...
WJBscribe: He does not have the authority to review a block in a dispute he is involved in. Mackensen has done the following:
 * 1) Did not give a reason for the block.
 * 2) Did not respond to comment on the block.
 * 3) Did not respond to email.
 * 4) Did not state a claimed arbcom case.
 * 5) Did not give any reference to a checkuser or a sockpuppet list I am supposedly on.
 * 6) Vandalised my user page and is actively attempting to prevent removal of vandalism.
 * 7) Gave the impression of reviewing a block he has a conflict of interest in.

Mackensen is actively trying to silence his conduct in this matter. He is not fit to have admin priveleges if this issue comes to arbcom. -Biophase 01:55, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Mackensen has given you a reason for the block - he has identified you as being a of PromX1. He is both a checkuser and a member of ArbCom. He is not required to reference you to particular requests or cases - there are good reasons why these sometimes are done off-wiki. He has not vandalised your page but tagged it according to his findings that you are a sockpuppet of an indefinitely blocked user. If you wish to contest his decision or have his actions reviewed you may have recourse to ArbCom though the email address I provided above. WjBscribe 02:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Mackensen has only now given a supposed reason after I had to wait for a month so I won't be sympathetic to him. His "tagging" is vandalism as he has refused discussion and comment on the issue and there is no valid reason to do so. I will take this matter to the arbcom and ask that he be removed from his "duties" as that appears to be the last resort.-Biophase 02:10, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * That is your prerogative. WjBscribe 02:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)