User talk:Biosthmors/Neuroscience assignment

Comments
In general, I think the byte total is too simplistic a rubric. Can we add that "improving existing portions of the article can count towards this. Completely rewriting articles can qualify as well."?

I take a quality over quantity kind of view, and one can do wonders on Wikipedia even by reducing byte counts, so I think it's an unfortunate rubric to use the byte count. I also think it encourages writing expansively.

I think it would be AWESOME if they could work on improving articles that would be reading assignments for your class next year. I also think it would be awesome if they could work on improving the quality of an article that might already be long, but out of date and horribly sourced. I think what matters most is a "before" and "after" look at the article. Biosthmors (talk) 13:48, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Links
There are citations in here from 2012 that have doi's and are in open journals like PLOS ONE but aren't linked so we should add that as a style point. It aids readers who want to verify the information. Biosthmors (talk) 15:56, 12 September 2013 (UTC)