User talk:Biovim

Speedy deletion nomination of Gongjindan
Hello Biovim,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gongjindan for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. --     L o g     X    17:19, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Status and Advice

 * As reviewing administrator, I did not delete the article--from the context, it's a chinese herbal medicine/ But it needs more content.What exactly is it--what plant is it made from, what is it used for, are there any references in English?. If the only references are Chinese, add a translation of the title.  DGG ( talk ) 20:54, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Woohwangchungsim-won for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Woohwangchungsim-won is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Woohwangchungsim-won until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Antrocent (&#9835;&#9836;) 00:51, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gongjin-dan


The article Gongjin-dan has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unsupported extraordinary medical claims, no content worth saving"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Gongjin-dan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gongjin-dan, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Gongjin-dan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 June 2023 (UTC)