User talk:Bipolarbear22

Proposed deletion of Methylenedioxypyrrolidinohexiophenone


The article Methylenedioxypyrrolidinohexiophenone has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references to reliable sources, fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jinkinson  talk to me  12:34, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Methylenedioxypyrrolidinohexiophenone
As the Propose Deletion template was not removed for seven days, I have deleted this article. Pages deleted in this way will be automatically restored on request, to me or at WP:Requests for undeletion; but this one would then be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute.

You wrote: "There won't be reliable sources until the general public is made aware of its existence" and "Working with a credible American laboratory to publish information on the compound", but the point is that Wikipedia is not the place for first announcement. The role of an encyclopedia is to summarise information which has already been published in reliable sources. This is expressed in the policies WP:Verifiability: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source" and WP:No original research which includes: "'If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery.'" Linked to those is the inclusion criterion called Notability, which looks for evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."

The time for a Wikipedia article will be after the product has been announced and has been discussed in independent sources like scientific journals. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:58, 23 October 2014 (UTC)