User talk:Birdjgchen

Online poll
Hi. Regarding your edits at LGBT rights in Taiwan and Same-sex marriage in Taiwan, per WP:BRD, please stop re-adding that poll without discussing and explaining why an unscientific random online poll should be included on the articles' talk pages. Thanks. Bennv3771 (talk) 12:20, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your advice. A few questions, 1. I am not quite sure that why wiki can not be allowed for 'everyone' to add updates? 2. This is not a random online poll but the biggest one in history on this issue ever since the major event that top court favors same-sax marriage. It is a significant sign of a right thing to do but a wrong way causing society turning their attitude from supportive to highly objective. 3. May I ask how the approval process is for updating? Are you the approver? No offense, just not very familiar of how the editing works.

May 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to LGBT rights in Taiwan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 12:21, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 12:22, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Same-sex marriage in Taiwan, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 12:24, 31 May 2017 (UTC)