User talk:Birdmanwoodhead

May 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chris Andersen has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chris Andersen was changed by Birdmanwoodhead (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.8951 on 2014-05-27T00:44:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:44, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Andersen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 00:49, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

The sidebar does not need his nickname; it is in the first line of the article. 331dot (talk) 00:51, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. TRL (talk) 01:02, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Andersen. 331dot (talk) 01:03, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Chris Andersen. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 01:11, 27 May 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 01:31, 6 June 2014 (UTC)