User talk:Biruxx

Welcome!
Hello, Biruxx, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister  talk  00:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Hardwell— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 23:15, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Lostprophets, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 14:39, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zedd (musician). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Your edits broke formatting as well as added a genre without sourcing, expressing against the established content Cannolis (talk) 22:09, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Disambiguation link notification for October 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited McFly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Don't Wanna Go to Bed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=690238238 your edit] to Hoobastank may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:29, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * in the Dark]]", "Running Away", and "The Reason". cite
 * |web|url=http://www.thetoptens.com/best-hoobastank-songs/

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Linkin Park. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  4TheWynne (talk) (contribs)  09:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Herrera, you may be blocked from editing. --Michig (talk) 21:46, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Your recent editing history at Doug Robb shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dr.  K.  22:18, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

There are specific criteria for speedy deletion (see WP:CSD. "unnecessary" is not one of them. Please acquaint yourself with the valid criteria as if you continue to edit in this way you are likely to be blocked from editing. --Michig (talk) 16:35, 29 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Please note that the criteria laid down in speedy deletion criteria are the ONLY criteria for which an article can be speedy-nominated and deleted. You nominated Doug Robb because it was "not well written". This is not a valid speedy reason; please refrain from making up your own deletion reasons. If an article which you think should not be here does not qualify under the speedy criteria you can nominate at articles for deletion.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:01, 28 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Nor are you allowed to remove AfD templates from nominated articles, as is clearly stated at the top of these pages, but which you did anyway on Mike Herrera. Please take these two messages as a serious warning. If you ignore them you will run a high risk of being blocked from editing here.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:09, 28 November 2015 (UTC)


 * I see that you deleted a previous warning on the same topic. That being so, you WILL be blocked from editing if you repeat either of the errors outlined in this posting. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:13, 28 November 2015 (UTC)


 * I have re-inserted the final warning which I gave you two days ago, which you deleted. You have arfect right to delete the warning, but not to ignore it. As you have again chosen to insert a made-up speedy template, I have blocked you for a short time so as to give you the opportunity of reading speedy deletion criteria.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:36, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.

March 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at The Calling, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Laber□T 21:18, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Ren & Stimpy "Adult Party Cartoon". Donner60 (talk) 02:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Simple Plan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jdcomix (talk) 23:50, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Butterfly (Crazy Town song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2000s. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Love Me or Hate Me, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grime. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

September 2017
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Destiny Leo (talk) 17:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Marshmello, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 06:51, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Skrillex, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sampler ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Skrillex check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Skrillex?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Alan Walker (music producer), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 17:49, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Gucci Gang, you may be blocked from editing.  Ss  112   17:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Your edits to genres
Biruxx, I am genuinely confused as to why you continue to change genres without ever specifying why in edit summaries and after receiving multiple warnings about it. Your edits look like that of a genre warrior. Please stop doing this without providing an adequate explanation in the summary (that's what it's there for) or sourcing changes. Thank you.  Ss  112   17:53, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

April 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at United Kingdom, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Your edit contradicted the cited reference. David Biddulph (talk) 16:03, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Geography of the United Kingdom, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Railfan23 (talk) 16:59, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Geography of the United Kingdom, you may be blocked from editing. Railfan23 (talk) 17:36, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I just thought that an image with more resolution would be better Biruxx (talk) 16:59, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Having one image so much larger then the rest messes up the page layout, especially on mobile devices with smaller screens. Users can simply click on the image if they want to see a larger version. Please don't adjust images to suit your own needs - there are hundreds of millions of Wikipedia readers with hugely varied needs. The standard image sizes are there for very good reason. Railfan23 (talk) 18:54, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 07:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

June 2021
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to V for Vendetta (film), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:07, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)